Terminology used in publications for post-mortem cross-sectional imaging
| Autor: | Gary M. Hatch, Kathrin Yen, Gil Brogdon, Bruno Morgan, Michael J. Thali, Peter Mygind Leth, Silke Grabherr, Krzysztof Woźniak, Naoya Takahashi, Fabrice Dedouit, Anders Persson, Seiji Shiotani, Christian Jackowski, Thomas D. Ruder, Guy N. Rutty |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2013 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Phrase Biopsy Computed tomography Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interventional Radiography Interventional Pathology and Forensic Medicine Terminology Cross-sectional imaging Forensic Pathology/standards Terminology as Topic medicine Humans Medical physics Forensic Pathology Modalities medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry ddc:614.1 Autopsy/standards Forensic Radiology Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biopsy/methods Post mortem computer tomography Forensic radiology Autopsy business Tomography X-Ray Computed Retsmedicin Biomedical engineering |
| Zdroj: | Rutty, G N, Brogdon, B G, Dedouit, F, Grabherr, S, Hatch, G M, Jackowski, C, Leth, P M, Persson, A, Ruder, T D, Shiotani, S, Takahashi, N, Thali, M, Wozniak, K, Yen, K & Morgan, B 2013, ' Terminology used in publications for post-mortem cross-sectional imaging ', International Journal of Legal Medicine , vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 465-466 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-012-0782-7 International Journal of Legal Medicine, Vol. 127, No 2 (2013) pp. 465-466 |
| ISSN: | 0937-9827 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00414-012-0782-7 |
| Popis: | We write to you today to suggest the need for standardisation of terminology used in the forensic/autopsy journals in the ever increasing number of publications in the emerging field post-mortem cross-sectionalimaging.Inouropinion,thereare too many different terms used currently both as words and/or abbreviations and the time has come to propose within the forensic literature that common terminology be applied to this field. The introduction of standardised terminology is critical, not only for those endeavouring to write and publish their work but also for those attempting to find references by keyword searches. We suggest the following terminology be introduced to initiate the process of standardisation: 1. Currently, the two modalities emerging as dominant in post-mortem imaging are computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. We propose, as has been adopted within the UK, these be generically referred to as post-mortem cross-sectional imaging, so both modalities are covered by a single phrase. Authors could then go on to specify which of the two modalities, i.e. post-mortem computed tomography or postmortem magnetic resonance imaging or both, are referred to within their work. 2. In the case of post-mortem computed tomography, we propose the abbreviation PMCT be used. In the case of |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink