With open science gaining traction, do we need an Australasia PubMed Central (PMC)? A qualitative investigation
Autor: | Lisa Kruesi, Kerry Tanner, Frada Burstein |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Open science
PubMed Knowledge management Research Facilities Biomedical Research Science Policy Science Oceania MEDLINE Libraries Institutional Repositories computer.software_genre Research and Analysis Methods Information Centers News aggregator Geographical Locations 03 medical and health sciences Open Science Political science Librarians Health care Medicine and Health Sciences Humans Management process SWOT analysis 030304 developmental biology Scientific Publishing 0303 health sciences Multidisciplinary business.industry 05 social sciences Australia Focus group Europe Professions Work (electrical) Open Access Publishing People and Places Medicine Population Groupings 0509 other social sciences 050904 information & library sciences business computer Publication Practices Research Article New Zealand |
Zdroj: | PLoS ONE, Vol 14, Iss 2, p e0212843 (2019) PLoS ONE |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
Popis: | Open biomedical repositories, such as PubMed Central (PMC), are a means to make research discoverable and permanently accessible. Assessing the potential interest of key stakeholders in an Australasia PubMed Central was the objective of this research. The investigation is novel, assisting in the development of open science infrastructure through its systematic analysis of the potential interest in, and viability of a biomedical repository for managing openly accessible research outputs for the Australasia region. The research adopted a qualitative approach based on semi-structured interviews and a focus group. Forty-four stakeholders located throughout Australia and New Zealand participated in the research. Participants expanded upon their experience of PubMed, MEDLINE, PMC and their use of information resources for research and clinical practice. The Evidence Based Healthcare (EBHC) pyramid was the theoretical model adopted to explain open biomedical repository processes. A strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis identified support for exploring membership of an international PMC system, in particular Europe PMC. Lessons learnt from PMC US, Europe PMC and PMC Canada (collectively known as PubMed Central International) informed the investigation. A major strength identified was that PubMed Central International has been able to achieve high levels of compliance way beyond that of most institutional repositories. A great threat faced is overcoming the difficulties of working together with other major world bodies and financially sustaining an Australasia PMC. Improving Australasian biomedical knowledge management processes may be possible from adopting a PMC for retrieving and transferring research, linked to the data underlying the research. This in turn could help put regional research under a brighter spotlight, potentially leading to improvements in research quality. There is an opportunity for a potential Australasia PMC to harvest biomedical research from the National Library of Australia's aggregator database, Trove and work closely with Europe PMC to avoid duplication of effort. Overall, establishment of an Australasia permanent biomedical digital open repository is perceived as important, with significant potential flow-on benefits to healthcare, industry and society. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |