Discrepancies Between Surgical Oncologists and Plastic Surgeons in Patient Information Provision and Personal Opinions Towards Immediate Breast Reconstruction
Autor: | Sabine Siesling, Annelotte C. M. van Bommel, Marie-Jeanne T. F. D. Vrancken Peeters, Kelly M. de Ligt, K. Schreuder, John H. Maduro, Renske K. Veenstra, Marc A. M. Mureau |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Guided Treatment in Optimal Selected Cancer Patients (GUTS), Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty Esthetics medicine.medical_treatment Mammaplasty NETHERLANDS MEDLINE clinician perspective 030230 surgery 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Breast cancer Patient satisfaction breast cancer Quality of life Patient Education as Topic Surveys and Questionnaires SKIN-SPARING MASTECTOMY medicine Humans POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS Stage (cooking) Practice Patterns Physicians' QUALITY IMPROVEMENT METAANALYSIS Aged Oncologists Surgeons Physician-Patient Relations OUTCOMES business.industry General surgery mastectomy immediate breast reconstruction Middle Aged medicine.disease CANCER TRENDS Radiation therapy Patient Satisfaction 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis POSTMASTECTOMY RECONSTRUCTION Surgery Female Breast reconstruction business Mastectomy RADIOTHERAPY |
Zdroj: | Annals of Plastic Surgery, 81(4), 383-388. LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS Annals of Plastic Surgery, 81(4), 383-388. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
ISSN: | 0148-7043 |
Popis: | Background Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) may improve quality of life of patients receiving mastectomy. However, a significant hospital variation exists in the use of IBR due to various reasons. To better understand this variation, the present study investigated preoperative information provision to patients and personal opinions of surgical oncologists and plastic surgeons towards potential contra-indications for IBR.Methods An online survey (35 questions) was developed including questions on respondent demographics, information provision to the patient about IBR and potential contra-indications by IBR technique.Results One-hundred-eighty-nine physicians participated: 118 surgical oncologists and 71 plastic surgeons. All clinicians discussed the possibility of IBR with their patients. Complications (79% versus 100%, P 75 years, breast size >D-cup, BMI >40 kg/m(2), smoking (for implant reconstruction), pulmonary/cardiac comorbidities (for autologous reconstruction) and radiotherapy were considered a contra-indication more frequently by plastic surgeons. In contrast, surgical oncologists reported tumor stage (cT3), nodal stage (cN2) and chemotherapy more frequently to be a contra-indication for IBR.Conclusion We observed that all respondents discussed the possibility of IBR with their patients, whereas patient-tailored information was given more frequently by plastic surgeons. Physicians differed in their opinions towards contra-indications for IBR, with plastic surgeons reporting patient-related risk factors for wound healing problems and surgical oncologists reporting oncological contra-indications more frequently. Consensus between physicians regarding contra-indications for IBR may optimize patient counseling and shared decision-making. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |