Evaluating optical stabilization of the beating heart
| Autor: | Sam V Lichtenstein, Terence Gilhuly, Septimiu E. Salcudean |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2003 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Diagnostic Imaging Male medicine.medical_specialty Beating heart Optics and Photonics Bypass grafting media_common.quotation_subject Movement Biomedical Engineering Illusion Coronary Artery Disease Electrocardiography Physical medicine and rehabilitation Surgical site Task Performance and Analysis Medicine Humans Coronary Artery Bypass Lighting media_common medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Signal Processing Computer-Assisted General Medicine Equipment Design Strobe light Image Enhancement Myocardial Contraction Surgery Equipment Failure Analysis Surgery Computer-Assisted Female business |
| Zdroj: | IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in MedicineBiology Society. 22(4) |
| ISSN: | 0739-5175 |
| Popis: | Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a surgical procedure performed to revascularize the areas of the heart deprived of oxygen by blockages. This procedure is relatively common. Improvement of this form of treatment is the topic of this article. An optical stabilization technique developed with the goal of enabling surgery on the beating heart is proposed and evaluated. The technique proposes that an ECG-triggered strobe light be focused on the surgical site making the heart appear still to the surgeon. The illusion of stillness then allows the surgeon to suture uninhibited by the actual motion. A test apparatus to model the heart was constructed and human-factors testing carried out to evaluate subject performance under conditions resembling those when suturing, with and without this strobe in place. In answer to the specific question of this research, "is strobing of a regular, beating heart beneficial to suturing as compared to suturing under normal lighting conditions?" the answer is "no". This was shown in both the objective and subjective measures. Whereas a strobed heart platform should have been less confusing to the subjects, easier to see, and thereby easier to mark, the opposite was seen. Time to perforrn the test was greater for the test of complicated motion with the strobe than without. Error increased as well. For both regularly lit room tests, subjects had better placement of marks as compared to when they did the same tests under optically stabilized conditions. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|