| Popis: |
To determine the effect of temperature on the accommodative response of non-human primate crystalline lenses during simulated accommodation.Eight lenses from 7 cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis, ages: 4.5-7.3 years; post-mortem time: 17.0 ± 16.4 h) were mounted in a lens stretcher. Stretching experiments were performed on each lens at 24 °C (room temperature), then the tissue was warmed to 35 °C (intraocular temperature) and the stretching experiments were repeated. The lens diameter, thickness, anterior and posterior surface radii of curvature, optical power, and the stretching force (load) were measured at each stretch position and the linear optomechanical relationships were quantified: load-lens diameter, load-thickness, power-load, load-anterior radius, and load-posterior radius. The rate of change for each parameter was quantified by performing a linear regression. The slopes of the linear regressions were compared at the two temperatures using a paired sample t-test.The average changes in the lens with stretching at 24 °C and 35 °C were: 3.07 ± 0.17 and 2.58 ± 0.15 for load-lens diameter (g/mm), -2.38 ± 0.20 and -2.00 ± 0.32 for load-thickness (g/mm), -13.35 ± 1.21 and -13.75 ± 1.26 for power-load (D/g), 0.41 ± 0.10 and 0.34 ± 0.05 for load-anterior radius of curvature (g/mm), and 1.35 ± 0.24 and 1.31 ± 0.35 for load-posterior radius of curvature (g/mm), respectively. The changes in load-diameter and load-thickness with lens stretching were significantly different for the two temperatures.Temperature influences the change in lens shape observed during simulated accommodation in non-human primate lenses. These results suggest that lens stretching experiments and other optomechanical measurement techniques on ex vivo crystalline lenses be conducted at 35 °C and that the temperature of the tissue sample be documented and maintained constant to ensure repeatability. |
Full Text from ScienceDirect