Optimising Multi-stakeholder Practices in Patient Engagement: A Gap Analysis to Enable Focused Evolution of Patient Engagement in the Development and Lifecycle Management of Medicines
| Autor: | A. Diaz-Ponce, Maria Jose Vicente Edo, Stuart Faulkner, M. Subramaniam, Elizabeth Manning, C. A. C. M. Pittens, L. Prieto-Remón, K. Huberman, N. S. Goedhart, Laiba Husain, E. H. Davies, Mathieu Boudes |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Athena Institute, Network Institute, APH - Global Health, Ethics, Law & Medical humanities, APH - Digital Health, APH - Societal Participation & Health |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Process management
SDG 16 - Peace Process (engineering) Computer science Delphi method Medicine research and development Patient engagement Sample (statistics) Context (language use) Gap analysis Medicines lifecycle 030226 pharmacology & pharmacy Application lifecycle management 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals Practices Humans Pharmacology (medical) 030212 general & internal medicine Pharmacology Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous) Original Research SDG 16 - Peace Justice and Strong Institutions Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health Justice and Strong Institutions Processes Work (electrical) Patient Participation |
| Zdroj: | Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science, 55(6), 1165-1179. SAGE Publications Inc. Faulkner, S D, Pittens, C A C M, Goedhart, N S, Davies, E H, Manning, E, Diaz-Ponce, A, Jose Vicente Edo, M, Prieto-Remón, L, Husain, L, Huberman, K, Boudes, M & Subramaniam, M 2021, ' Optimising Multi-stakeholder Practices in Patient Engagement : A Gap Analysis to Enable Focused Evolution of Patient Engagement in the Development and Lifecycle Management of Medicines ', Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1165-1179 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-021-00313-9 Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science |
| ISSN: | 2168-4790 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s43441-021-00313-9 |
| Popis: | Background The PARADIGM consortium aimed to make patient engagement in the development and lifecycle management of medicines easier and more effective for all, with the development of new tools that fulfil robustly defined gaps where engagement is suboptimal. Aims To generate an inventory of gaps in patient engagement practices and process from existing global examples. Methods A large set of criteria for effective patient engagement previously defined via a multi-stakeholder Delphi method, were mapped under fourteen overarching themes. A gap analysis was then performed by twenty-seven reviewers against the resulting forty-six mapped criteria, on a sample of seventy initiatives from global databases. Results An inventory of gaps was identified including contextual information as to why the gaps exist. Our work identified general patterns where patient engagement was suboptimal—defined as; fragmented reporting and dissemination of patient engagement activities, and the fundamental principles defined in frameworks or guidance being poorly adhered to in actual practice. Specific gaps were identified for sixteen criteria. Additionally, it was also common to observe primary aspects of a process were addressed for a given criteria (i.e. training for roles and responsibilities) but a secondary context element was lacking (i.e. making training material accessible/understandable/meaningful to all participants). Conclusion The results show that the evolution towards meaningful and systematic patient engagement is occurring, yet more importantly they provide clear directional insights to help enhance collaborative practices and co-design solutions. This targeted impact to catalyse a needs-oriented health system that integrates patient engagement at its core is essential. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink