Reductions in deforestation and poverty from decentralized forest management in Nepal
| Autor: | Arun Agrawal, Birendra K. Karna, Mark J. Whittingham, Johan A. Oldekop, Katharine R. E. Sims |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
ResearchInstitutes_Networks_Beacons/global_development_institute
Global and Planetary Change Ecology Poverty Renewable Energy Sustainability and the Environment Geography Planning and Development Forest management Management Monitoring Policy and Law Census Urban Studies Global Development Institute Geography Rural poverty Deforestation Forest cover Socioeconomics Baseline (configuration management) Socioeconomic status Nature and Landscape Conservation Food Science |
| Zdroj: | Oldekop, J, Sims, K R E, Karna, B K, Whittingham, M J & Agrawal, A 2019, ' Reductions in deforestation and poverty from decentralized forest management in Nepal ', Nature Sustainability, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 421-428 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0277-3 |
| ISSN: | 2398-9629 |
| DOI: | 10.1038/s41893-019-0277-3 |
| Popis: | Since the 1980’s, decentralized forest management has been promoted as a way to enhance sustainable forest use and reduce rural poverty. Rural communities manage increasing amounts of the world’s forests, yet rigorous evidence using large-N data on whether community-based forest management (CFM) can jointly reduce both deforestation and poverty remains scarce. We estimate the impacts of CFM using a large longitudinal dataset that integrates national census-based poverty measures with high-resolution forest cover change data, and near-complete information on Nepal’s >18,000 community forests. We compare changes in forest cover and poverty from 2000–2012 for subdistricts with or without CFM arrangements, but that are otherwise similar in terms of socioeconomic and biophysical baseline measures. Our results indicate that CFM has, on average, contributed to significant net reductions in both poverty and deforestation across Nepal, and that CFM increases the likelihood of win–win outcomes. We also find that the estimated reduced deforestation impacts of community forests are lower where baseline poverty levels are high, and greater where community forests are larger and have existed longer. These results indicate that greater benefits may result from longer-term investments and larger areas committed to CFM, but that community forests established in poorer areas may require additional support to minimize tradeoffs between socioeconomic and environmental outcomes. Rural communities manage much of the world’s forests, but the effects on both landscapes and people are still unclear. This study estimates the impacts of such community-based forest management in Nepal from 2000–2012 and finds significant net reductions in both deforestation and poverty. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink