Elective versus urgent in-hospital transcatheter aortic valve implantation
| Autor: | Uday Trivedi, Aung Myat, Azeem S Sheikh, Kristoffer Vincent Tanseco, Adam de Belder, James Cockburn, David Hildick-Smith, Timothy Williams, Alex Kabahizi |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Demographics Transcatheter aortic medicine.medical_treatment 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology Severity of Illness Index Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Valve replacement Risk Factors medicine Humans Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging 030212 general & internal medicine business.industry Mortality rate Treatment options General Medicine Aortic Valve Stenosis medicine.disease Hospitals Surgery Stenosis Treatment Outcome Aortic Valve Heart Valve Prosthesis Hospital admission Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business |
| Zdroj: | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac AngiographyInterventionsREFERENCES. 98(1) |
| ISSN: | 1522-726X |
| Popis: | BACKGROUND Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is maturing as a treatment option and is now often undertaken during an unscheduled index hospital admission. The aim of this study was to look at procedural and mid-term outcomes of patients undergoing elective versus urgent in-hospital transcatheter aortic valve implantation. METHODS We identified a total of 1,157 patients who underwent TAVI between November 2007 and November 2019 at the Sussex Cardiac Centre in the UK. We compared the demographics, procedural outcomes, 30-day and 1-year mortality between elective and urgent patients. Emergency and salvage TAVI cases were excluded. RESULTS Of the 1,157 patients who underwent the procedure, 975 (84.3%) had elective while 182 (15.7%) had urgent TAVI. Predominant aortic stenosis was more frequent in elective patients (91.7% vs. 77.4%); p |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text