| Autor: |
Astrid Brousselle, Dominique Tremblay, Raynald Pineault, Pierre Tousignant, Danièle Roberge, Sylvie Provost, Mylaine Breton, Mamadou Diop, Michel Fournier, Lynda Benhadj |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Rok vydání: |
2015 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
International Journal of Family Medicine |
| ISSN: |
2090-2042 |
| DOI: |
10.1155/2015/176812 |
| Popis: |
Objective. To analyze the impact of patients’ experience of care at their usual source of primary care on their choice of point of entry into cancer investigation process, time to diagnosis, and presence of metastatic cancer at time of diagnosis. Method. A questionnaire was administered to 438 patients with cancer (breast, lung, and colorectal) between 2011 and 2013 in four oncology clinics of Quebec (Canada). Multiple regression analyses (logistic and Cox models) were conducted. Results. Among patients with symptoms leading to investigation of cancer (n=307), 47% used their usual source of primary care as the point of entry for investigation. Greater comprehensiveness of care was associated with the decision to use this source as point of entry (OR = 1.25; CI 90% = 1.06–1.46), as well as with shorter times between first symptoms and investigation (HR = 1.11; p=0.05), while greater accessibility was associated with shorter times between investigation and diagnosis (HR = 1.13; p<0.01). Conclusion. Experience of care at the usual source of primary care has a slight influence on the choice of point of entry for cancer investigation and on time to diagnosis. This influence appears to be more related to patients’ perceptions of the accessibility and comprehensiveness of their usual source of primary care. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
