Do environmental, economic and reputational advantages strengthen green practices' impact on environmental performance?
Autor: | Nor’Aini Yusof, Ernawati Mustafa Kamal, Amin Akhavan Tabassi |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
business.industry
Strategy and Management media_common.quotation_subject 05 social sciences 06 humanities and the arts Management Monitoring Policy and Law Development Environmental economics 0603 philosophy ethics and religion Structural equation modeling Economic advantage Construction industry Hazardous waste Supply management Perception 0502 economics and business Global Positioning System 060301 applied ethics business 050203 business & management media_common |
Zdroj: | Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 27:2081-2093 |
ISSN: | 1535-3966 1535-3958 |
Popis: | Adopting green practices (GPs) in project organisations is one way to address the hazardous impact of construction activities and improve environmental performance (EnvP). EnvP refers to the outcomes of practices that aim to protect the environment (Ardito & Dangelico, 2018; Lee, Ooi, Chong, & Lin, 2015). To ensure superior EnvP, studies have identified three crucial GPs during project planning and implementation. These practices are green supply management (GSM) (Woo, Kim, Chung, & Rho, 2016; Yusof, Tabassi, & Esa, 2020), responsible consumption (RC) (Martens & Carvalho, 2017; Zhu, Zhao, & Sarkis, 2011) and waste management (WM) (Ajayi et al., 2017). With environmental regulations and certification yet to be effective in curbing pollution (Li, Zuo, Cai, & Zillante, 2018; Raman, 2019), and the increasing number of accidents and deaths at construction sites (Dermawan, 2018), doubts have arisen in the construction industries of developing countries about whether GPs achieve environmental goals (Palansamy, Chin, & Tan, 2019; Shurrab, Hussain, & Khan, 2019). |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |