Structured report for chest high-resolution computed tomography in patients with connective tissue disease: Impact on the report quality as perceived by referring clinicians
| Autor: | Lorenzo Cereser, Anna Linda, Filippo Marchesini, Rossano Girometti, G. De Marchi, S. Sacco, Giuseppe Como, Chiara Zuiani, E. Di Poi |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male High-resolution computed tomography medicine.medical_specialty Wilcoxon signed-rank test Medical Records 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging Young Adult 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine McNemar's test Structured reporting Humans Medicine Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Clinical significance Statistical analysis In patient Referral and Consultation Aged Retrospective Studies Aged 80 and over Connective tissue diseases medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Chest General Medicine Middle Aged Thorax medicine.disease Connective tissue disease 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Physical therapy Female Interdisciplinary Communication Rheumatologists Tomography X-Ray Computed business |
| Zdroj: | European Journal of Radiology. 131:109269 |
| ISSN: | 0720-048X |
| Popis: | RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To evaluate the impact on perceived report quality of referring rheumatologists for a chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) structured report (SR) template for patients with connective tissue disease (CTD), compared to the traditional narrative report (NR). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively considered 123 HRCTs in patients with CTD. Three radiologists, blinded to the original NRs they wrote during clinical routine, re-reported each HRCT using an SR dedicated template. We then divided all NR-SR couples into three groups (41 HRCT each). Each group was evaluated by one of three rheumatologists (R1, R2, R3), who expressed their perceived report quality for the respective pools of NRs and SRs in terms of completeness, clarity (both on a 10-points scale), and clinical relevance (on a 5-points scale). The Wilcoxon test and the McNemar test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS For each rheumatologist, SR received higher ratings compared to NR for completeness (median ratings: R1, 10 vs. 7; R2, 10 vs. 8; R3, 10 vs. 6, all p |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect