Glansectomy and Split-thickness Skin Graft for Penile Cancer
| Autor: | Maarten Albersen, Alex Freeman, Varun Sahdev, Asif Muneer, Michelle Christodoulidou, Peter Malone, Arie Parnham, Raj Nigam |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Urologic Surgical Procedures Male Urology Penile Neoplasm 030232 urology & nephrology 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine medicine Humans Penile cancer Glans Penile Neoplasms Retrospective Studies business.industry Glans penis Skin Transplantation Fascia Middle Aged medicine.disease Meatal stenosis Surgery Dissection Treatment Outcome medicine.anatomical_structure 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Carcinoma Squamous Cell business Penis |
| Zdroj: | European Urology. 73:284-289 |
| ISSN: | 0302-2838 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.048 |
| Popis: | Background Penile cancer is a rare malignancy that is confined to the glans in up to four out of five cases. Although descriptions of glansectomy exist, there are no contemporary video explanations or large published single centre series. Objective To show the efficacy and safety of glansectomy and split-thickness skin graft (STSG) reconstruction. Design, setting, and participants Data were collected retrospectively for patients identified from surgical theatre diaries between February 2005 and January 2016. 177 patients with histologically proven squamous-cell carcinoma on the glans underwent glansectomy and STSG at a tertiary referral centre in the UK. The median follow-up was 41.4 mo. Surgical procedure The skin is incised at the subcoronal level and deepened onto Buck's fascia. Dissection is performed over or under Buck's fascia, depending on suspicion of invasion or risk of disease. The glans is excised and a neoglans is created using a STSG. Measurements Local recurrence, cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and complications. Results and limitations Sixteen out of 172 patients (9.3%) experienced local recurrence during the follow-up period. Eighteen out of 174 (10.7%) patients died of penile cancer, while 29 patients in total died during the follow-up period. Of 145 patients, 9% required operative intervention for complications, including graft loss and meatal stenosis. Limitations include the retrospective data collection and the lack of functional and sexual outcomes. Conclusions Glansectomy and STSG comprise a safe procedure in terms of oncologic control and complications for patients with penile cancer confined to the glans penis. Further studies are required to assess functional and sexual outcomes in these patients. Patient summary We report on the management of penile cancers confined to the head of the penis using glansectomy and a split-thickness skin graft to recreate the appearance of a glans. This technique is safe and effective, with limited complications. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect