Real-World Experience of mHealth Implementation in Clinical Practice (the Box): Design and Usability Study
| Autor: | Tom E Biersteker, Roderick W Treskes, Alexander D Hilt, Enno T. van der Velde, Martin J. Schalij |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Original Paper
mobile phone patient satisfaction Heart disease business.industry Health Informatics Usability remote patient monitoring medicine.disease patient empowerment Computer Science Applications External validity mHealth Interquartile range cardiology Structured interview Health care medicine Outpatient clinic eHealth Medical emergency Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business |
| Zdroj: | JMIR Cardio |
| ISSN: | 2561-1011 |
| DOI: | 10.2196/26072 |
| Popis: | Background Mobile health (mHealth) is an emerging field of scientific interest worldwide. Potential benefits include increased patient engagement, improved clinical outcomes, and reduced health care costs. However, mHealth is often studied in projects or trials, and structural implantation in clinical practice is less common. Objective The purpose of this paper is to outline the design of the Box and its implementation and use in an outpatient clinic setting. The impact on logistical outcomes and patient and provider satisfaction is discussed. Methods In 2016, an mHealth care track including smartphone-compatible devices, named the Box, was implemented in the cardiology department of a tertiary medical center in the Netherlands. Patients with myocardial infarction, rhythm disorders, cardiac surgery, heart failure, and congenital heart disease received devices to measure daily weight, blood pressure, heart rate, temperature, and oxygen saturation. In addition, professional and patient user comments on the experience with the care track were obtained via structured interviews. Results From 2016 to April 2020, a total of 1140 patients were connected to the mHealth care track. On average, a Box cost €350 (US $375), not including extra staff costs. The median patient age was 60.8 (IQR 52.9-69.3) years, and 73.59% (839/1140) were male. A median of 260 (IQR 105-641) measurements was taken on a median of 189 (IQR 98-372) days. Patients praised the ease of use of the devices and felt more involved with their illness and care. Professionals reported more productive outpatient consultations as well as improved insight into health parameters such as blood pressure and weight. A feedback loop from the hospital to patient to focus on measurements was commented as an important improvement by both patients and professionals. Conclusions In this study, the design and implementation of an mHealth care track for outpatient follow-up of patients with various cardiovascular diseases is described. Data from these 4 years indicate that mHealth is feasible to incorporate in outpatient management and is generally well-accepted by patients and providers. Limitations include the need for manual measurement data checks and the risk of data overload. Moreover, the tertiary care setting in which the Box was introduced may limit the external validity of logistical and financial end points to other medical centers. More evidence is needed to show the effects of mHealth on clinical outcomes and on cost-effectiveness. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|