An economic evaluation of a video- and text-based computer-tailored intervention for smoking cessation: a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Autor: Eline Suzanne Smit, Daniela N Schulz, Silvia M. A. A. Evers, Hein de Vries, Catherine Bolman, Jean W M Muris, N.E. Stanczyk
Přispěvatelé: Health promotion, Family Medicine, Health Services Research, RS: CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, RS: CAPHRI - Health Technology Assessment, RS: CAPHRI - Asthma and COPD, RS: CAPHRI - Health Promotion and Health Communication, RS-Research Program The Interaction between Implicit and Explicit Strategies for Behaviour (IIESB), Persuasive Communication (ASCoR, FMG)
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2014
Předmět:
Male
Economics
Cost effectiveness
Cost-Benefit Analysis
medicine.medical_treatment
Video Recording
Psychological intervention
Social Sciences
lcsh:Medicine
RELAPSE
law.invention
Database and Informatics Methods
Randomized controlled trial
Quality of life
law
QUALITY-OF-LIFE
DEPENDENCE
Outcome Assessment
Health Care

SUPPORT
Medicine and Health Sciences
PROGRAM
Public and Occupational Health
lcsh:Science
Multidisciplinary
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Middle Aged
Tailored Intervention
INTENTION
Health Education and Awareness
Female
HEALTH
Behavioral and Social Aspects of Health
Research Article
SMOKERS
medicine.medical_specialty
Tobacco Control
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Health Informatics
Research and Analysis Methods
Health Economics
Willingness to pay
medicine
Humans
Health Care Quality
Demography
Text Messaging
Health Care Policy
Computers
business.industry
lcsh:R
FAGERSTROM TEST
Economic Analysis
Health Care
Physical therapy
Smoking cessation
Smoking Cessation
lcsh:Q
Preventive Medicine
business
Follow-Up Studies
Zdroj: PLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 10, p e110117 (2014)
PLOS ONE, 9(10):e110117. Public Library of Science
PLOS ONE, 9(10):e110117, 1-14. Public Library of Science
PLoS ONE
Stanczyk, N E, Smit, E S, Schulz, D N, de Vries, H, Bolman, C, Muris, J W M & Evers, SMAA 2014, ' An Economic Evaluation of a Video-and Text-Based Computer-Tailored Intervention for Smoking Cessation: A Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial ', PLOS ONE, vol. 9, no. 10, e110117, pp. 1-14 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110117
PLoS ONE, 9(10). Public Library of Science
ISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110117
Popis: BACKGROUND: Although evidence exists for the effectiveness of web-based smoking cessation interventions, information about the cost-effectiveness of these interventions is limited. OBJECTIVE: The study investigated the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of two web-based computer-tailored (CT) smoking cessation interventions (video- vs. text-based CT) compared to a control condition that received general text-based advice. METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial, respondents were allocated to the video-based condition (N = 670), the text-based condition (N = 708) or the control condition (N = 721). Societal costs, smoking status, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs; EQ-5D-3L) were assessed at baseline, six-and twelve-month follow-up. The incremental costs per abstinent respondent and per QALYs gained were calculated. To account for uncertainty, bootstrapping techniques and sensitivity analyses were carried out. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the three conditions regarding demographics, baseline values of outcomes and societal costs over the three months prior to baseline. Analyses using prolonged abstinence as outcome measure indicated that from a willingness to pay of €1,500, the video-based intervention was likely to be the most cost-effective treatment, whereas from a willingness to pay of €50,400, the text-based intervention was likely to be the most cost-effective. With regard to cost-utilities, when quality of life was used as outcome measure, the control condition had the highest probability of being the most preferable treatment. Sensitivity analyses yielded comparable results. CONCLUSION: The video-based CT smoking cessation intervention was the most cost-effective treatment for smoking abstinence after twelve months, varying the willingness to pay per abstinent respondent from €0 up to €80,000. With regard to cost-utility, the control condition seemed to be the most preferable treatment. Probably, more time will be required to assess changes in quality of life. Future studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to investigate whether cost-utility results regarding quality of life may change in the long run. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Nederlands Trial Register NTR3102.
Databáze: OpenAIRE