State Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption, 2006
Autor: | Katherine R. Gonzales, Jim Roeber, Frank J. Chaloupka, Jeffrey J. Sacks, Robert D. Brewer, Ellen Bouchery |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2013 |
Předmět: |
Government
Epidemiology Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health Poison control Binge drinking Efficiency jel:I United States Excessive alcohol consumption Binge Drinking Alcoholism Models Economic jel:J Cost of Illness Economic cost Environmental health Injury prevention Per capita State Costs Alcohol Consumption Substance Abuse Mental Health Humans Business Excise Health Expenditures health care economics and organizations State Government |
Popis: | Background Excessive alcohol consumption is responsible for an average of 80,000 deaths in the U.S. each year and cost $223.5 billion ($1.90/drink) in 2006. Comparable state estimates of this cost are needed to help inform prevention strategies. Purpose The goal of the study was to estimate the economic cost of excessive drinking by state for 2006. Methods From December 2011 to November 2012, an expert panel developed methods to allocate component costs from the 2006 national estimate to states for (1) total; (2) government; (3) binge drinking; and (4) underage drinking costs. Differences in average state wages were used to adjust productivity losses. Results In 2006, the median state cost of excessive drinking was $2.9 billion (range: $31.9 billion [California] to $419.6 million [North Dakota]); the median cost per drink, $1.91 (range: $2.74 [Utah] to $0.88 [New Hampshire]); and the median per capita cost, $703 (range: $1662 [District of Columbia] to $578 [Utah]). A median of 42% of state costs were paid by government (range: 45.0% [Utah] to 37.0% [Mississippi]). Binge drinking was responsible for a median of 76.6% of state costs (range: 83.1% [Louisiana] to 71.6% [Massachusetts]); underage drinking, a median of 11.2% of state costs (range: 20.0% [Wyoming] to 5.5% [District of Columbia]). Conclusions Excessive drinking cost states a median of $2.9 billion in 2006. Most of the costs were due to binge drinking and about $2 of every $5 were paid by government. The Guide to Community Preventive Services has recommended several evidence-based strategies—including increasing alcohol excise taxes, limiting alcohol outlet density, and commercial host liability—that can help reduce excessive alcohol use and the associated economic costs. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |