Physical property investigation of contemporary glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials
Autor: | Matthew Moberg, John Brewster, Howard W. Roberts, John Nicholson |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
Universal testing machine
Materials science Flexural modulus Acrylic Resins Glass ionomer cement 030206 dentistry Silicon Dioxide Indentation hardness Physical property Dental Materials 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Fracture toughness Flexural strength Glass Ionomer Cements 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Materials Testing Knoop hardness test Composite material Dental Restoration Permanent General Dentistry |
Zdroj: | Clinical Oral Investigations. 23:1295-1308 |
ISSN: | 1436-3771 1432-6981 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00784-018-2554-3 |
Popis: | The objective of this study was to investigate selected physical properties of nine contemporary and recently marketed glass ionomer cement (GIC) and four resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGI) dental restorative materials.Specimens (n = 12) were fabricated for fracture toughness and flexure strength using standardized, stainless steel molds. Testing was completed on a universal testing machine until failure. Knoop hardness was obtained using failed fracture toughness specimens on a microhardness tester, while both flexural modulus and flexural toughness was obtained by analysis of the flexure strength results data. Testing was completed at 1 h, 24 h, 1 week, and then at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Mean data was analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney (p = 0.05).Physical properties results were material dependent. Physical properties of the GIC and RMGI products were inferior at 1 h compared to that at 24 h. Some improvement in selected physical properties were noted over time, but development processes were basically concluded by 24 h. A few materials demonstrated improved physical properties over the course of the evaluation.Under the conditions of this study: 1. GIC and RMGI physical property performance over time was material dependent; 2. Polyalkenoate maturation processes are essentially complete by 24 h; 3. Although differences in GIC physical properties were noted, the small magnitude of the divergences may render such to be unlikely of clinical significance; 4. Modest increases in some GIC physical properties were noted especially flexural modulus and hardness, which lends support to reports of a maturing hydrogel matrix; 5. Overall, GIC product physical properties were more stable than RMGI; 6. A similar modulus reduction at 6 months for both RMGI and GIC produced may suggest a polyalkenoate matrix change; and 7. Globally, RMGI products demonstrated higher values of flexure strength, flexural toughness, and fracture toughness than GIC materials.As compared to RMGI materials, conventional glass ionomer restorative materials demonstrate more stability in physical properties. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |