Distal clavicle autograft for anterior-inferior glenoid augmentation: A comparative cadaveric anatomic study

Autor:	Martim Pinto, Brent Cone, Matthew C Hess, Johnathan F. Williams, William S. Brooks, Amit M. Momaya, Brent A. Ponce, Parke Hudson, Eugene W. Brabston
Rok vydání:	2019
Předmět:	Shoulder 030222 orthopedics Distal clavicle business.industry Rehabilitation Physical Therapy Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 030229 sport sciences Anatomy Coracoid 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Medicine Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Surgery Cadaveric spasm business
Zdroj:	Shoulder Elbow
ISSN:	1758-5740 1758-5732
DOI:	10.1177/1758573219869335
Popis:	Introduction The aim of this study was to anatomically compare distal clavicle and coracoid autografts and their potential to augment anterior-inferior glenoid bone loss. Methods Ten millimeters of distal clavicle and 20 mm of coracoid were harvested bilaterally from 32 cadavers. Length, weight, and height were measured and surface area and density were calculated. For each graft, ipsilateral measurements were compared and the ability to restore corresponding glenoid bone loss was calculated. Results Distal clavicle grafts were larger than coracoid grafts with respect to length (22.3 mm versus 17.7 mm; p 3 versus 1.96 cm3; p = 0.002). Coracoid grafts had larger widths (14.56 mm versus 10.52 mm; p 3 versus 1.18 g/cm3; p 2 versus 1.5 cm2; p 2 versus 1.5 cm2; p Discussion Distal clavicle grafts were larger and restored larger bony defects but had greater variability and lower density than coracoid grafts. Clinical studies are needed to compare these graft options.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::97bce51813810b6ddd3e947ab205bfe2 https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573219869335 Zobrazit plný text záznamu