Continuing care for patients with alcohol use disorders
| Autor: | Dieter Zeeuws, Evelien Lenaerts, Leo Pas, Frieda Matthys, Bert Aertgeerts, Peter J. Anderson, Catharina Matheï |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Clinical sciences, Neuroprotection & Neuromodulation, Psychiatry |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2014 |
| Předmět: |
Pharmacology
Chronic care Clinical Trials as Topic/methods Clinical Trials as Topic medicine.medical_specialty business.industry Psychological intervention MEDLINE CINAHL PsycINFO Continuity of Patient Care Toxicology Integrated care Psychiatry and Mental health Treatment Outcome Intervention (counseling) Relative risk Continuity of Patient Care/trends medicine Humans Pharmacology (medical) Alcohol-Related Disorders/diagnosis Psychiatry business Alcohol-Related Disorders |
| Popis: | Background A chronic care perspective should be adopted in the treatment of patients with alcohol use disorders (AUDs). Initial treatment in a more intense psychiatric care setting should be followed by continuing care. This systematic review aims to identify effective continuing care interventions for patients with AUDs. Methods Electronic databases were searched up to February 2013 (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL and PsycINFO) to identify RCTs studying continuing care interventions for patients with AUDs. Study selection and quality appraisal was done independently by two reviewers. Drinking and treatment engagement outcomes were considered. Relative risks and mean differences were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. A statistical pooling of results was planned. Results 20 trials out of 15,235 identified studies met the inclusion criteria. Only six were evaluated as methodologically strong enough and included for further analysis. Interventions ranged from telephone calls and nurse follow-up to various forms of individual or couples counseling. Four trials suggested that supplementing usual continuing care with an active intervention empowering the patient, could be beneficial to drinking outcomes. Effect sizes were limited and not consistent across all outcomes. Because of heterogeneity in the interventions and outcome measures, a meta-analysis could not be performed. Conclusion For the treatment of a disease with such devastating consequences, it is remarkable how few high quality studies are available. Adding an active intervention to usual continuing care seems to improve treatment outcomes. We propose an integrated care program with different elements from the selected studies and discuss implications for further research. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|