Effects of an Experimental vs. Traditional Military Training Program on 2-Mile Run Performance During the Army Physical Fitness Test
Autor: | Brandon L. Stone, Aaron D. Heishman, Jay A. Campbell |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Adolescent Physical fitness 0211 other engineering and technologies Physical Therapy Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 02 engineering and technology Running Young Adult 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Physical medicine and rehabilitation Humans Medicine Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Aerobic capacity Rating of perceived exertion 021110 strategic defence & security studies Cross-Over Studies business.industry 030229 sport sciences General Medicine medicine.disease Crossover study Test (assessment) Military personnel Military Personnel Physical Fitness Exercise Test Musculoskeletal injury Female business Anaerobic exercise Physical Conditioning Human |
Zdroj: | Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 34:3431-3438 |
ISSN: | 1064-8011 |
DOI: | 10.1519/jsc.0000000000002176 |
Popis: | Stone, BL, Heishman, AD, and Campbell, JA. The effects of an experimental vs. traditional military training program on 2-mile run performance during the army physical fitness test. J Strength Cond Res 34(12): 3431-3438, 2020-The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of an experimental vs. traditional military run training on 2-mile run ability in the Army Reserve Officers' Training Corps cadets. Fifty college-aged cadets were randomly placed into 2 groups and trained for 4 weeks with either an experimental running program (EXP, n = 22) comprised rating of perceived exertion (RPE) intensity-specific, energy system-based intervals or with traditional military running program (TRA, n = 28) using a crossover study design. A 2-mile run assessment was performed just before the start, at the end of the first 4 weeks, and again after the second 4 weeks of training after crossover. The EXP program significantly decreased 2-mile run times (961.3 ± 155.8 seconds to 943.4 ± 140.2 seconds, p = 0.012, baseline to post 1), whereas the TRA group experienced a significant increase in run times (901.0 ± 79.2 vs. 913.9 ± 82.9 seconds) over the same training period. There was a moderate effect size (d = 0.61, p = 0.07) for the experimental run program to "reverse" the adverse effects of the traditional program within the 4-week training period (post 1 to post 2) after treatment crossover. Thus, for short-term training of military personnel, RPE intensity-specific running program comprising aerobic and anaerobic system development can enhance 2-mile run performance superior to a traditional program while reducing training volume (60 minutes per session vs. 43.2 minutes per session, respectively). Future research should extend the training period to determine efficacy of this training approach for long-term improvement of aerobic capacity and possible reduction of musculoskeletal injury. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |