Skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine–alcohol versus povidone iodine–alcohol, with and without skin scrubbing, for prevention of intravascular-catheter-related infection (CLEAN): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, two-by-two factorial trial

Autor: Dorothée Balayn, Jean-Christophe Lucet, Florent Wallet, Lila Bouadma, Stéphane Ruckly, Bertrand Souweine, Serge Alfandari, Alain Mercat, Arnaud Friggeri, Jean-François Timsit, Nicolas Allou, Julien Pascal, Sigismond Lasocki, Olivier Mimoz, Véronique Goudet, Alain Lepape, Thomas Kerforne
Přispěvatelé: Service d'anesthésie réanimation [Poitiers], Centre hospitalier universitaire de Poitiers (CHU Poitiers), Pharmacologie des anti-infectieux (PHAR), Université de Poitiers-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Hôpital Bichat - Claude Bernard, Laboratoire Microorganismes : Génome et Environnement (LMGE), Université Blaise Pascal - Clermont-Ferrand 2 (UBP)-Université d'Auvergne - Clermont-Ferrand I (UdA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Unité de Soins Intensifs Médicaux, Service des maladies du sang [Angers], Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers (CHU Angers), PRES Université Nantes Angers Le Mans (UNAM)-PRES Université Nantes Angers Le Mans (UNAM), Pôle d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Service des maladies infectieuses, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Laboratoire des pathogènes émergents -- Emerging Pathogens Laboratory (LPE-Fondation Mérieux), Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie (CIRI), École normale supérieure de Lyon (ENS de Lyon)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne (UJM)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-École normale supérieure de Lyon (ENS de Lyon)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne (UJM)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centre hospitalier Félix-Guyon [Saint-Denis, La Réunion], Epidémiologie pronostique des cancers et affections graves, Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Service de Réanimation (Nord), Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud [CHU - HCL] (CHLS), Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL)-Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Institut d'oncologie/développement Albert Bonniot de Grenoble (INSERM U823), Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-CHU Grenoble-EFS-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie - UMR (CIRI), École normale supérieure - Lyon (ENS Lyon)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-École normale supérieure - Lyon (ENS Lyon)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Blaise Pascal - Clermont-Ferrand 2 (UBP)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université d'Auvergne - Clermont-Ferrand I (UdA)
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2015
Předmět:
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Catheterization
Central Venous

medicine.drug_class
[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]
Population
Antisepsis
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
law.invention
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Catheters
Indwelling

Antiseptic
Randomized controlled trial
law
Catheterization
Peripheral

Medicine
Humans
030212 general & internal medicine
Adverse effect
education
Povidone-Iodine
ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS
Aged
education.field_of_study
Catheter insertion
Ethanol
business.industry
Chlorhexidine
General Medicine
Middle Aged
[SDV.SP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Pharmaceutical sciences
3. Good health
Surgery
Discontinuation
Catheter
Intensive Care Units
Treatment Outcome
Catheter-Related Infections
Anti-Infective Agents
Local

Drug Therapy
Combination

Female
business
Vascular Access Devices
medicine.drug
Zdroj: The Lancet
The Lancet, 2015, 386 (10008), pp.2069-2077. ⟨10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00244-5⟩
The Lancet, Elsevier, 2015, 386 (10008), pp.2069-2077. ⟨10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00244-5⟩
ISSN: 0140-6736
1474-547X
0923-7577
Popis: Summary Background Intravascular-catheter-related infections are frequent life-threatening events in health care, but incidence can be decreased by improvements in the quality of care. Optimisation of skin antisepsis is essential to prevent short-term catheter-related infections. We hypothesised that chlorhexidine–alcohol would be more effective than povidone iodine–alcohol as a skin antiseptic to prevent intravascular-catheter-related infections. Methods In this open-label, randomised controlled trial with a two-by-two factorial design, we enrolled consecutive adults (age ≥18 years) admitted to one of 11 French intensive-care units and requiring at least one of central-venous, haemodialysis, or arterial catheters. Before catheter insertion, we randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) patients via a secure web-based random-number generator (permuted blocks of eight, stratified by centre) to have all intravascular catheters prepared with 2% chlorhexidine–70% isopropyl alcohol (chlorhexidine–alcohol) or 5% povidone iodine–69% ethanol (povidone iodine–alcohol), with or without scrubbing of the skin with detergent before antiseptic application. Physicians and nurses were not masked to group assignment but microbiologists and outcome assessors were. The primary outcome was the incidence of catheter-related infections with chlorhexidine–alcohol versus povidone iodine–alcohol in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01629550 and is closed to new participants. Findings Between Oct 26, 2012, and Feb 12, 2014, 2546 patients were eligible to participate in the study. We randomly assigned 1181 patients (2547 catheters) to chlorhexidine–alcohol (594 patients with scrubbing, 587 without) and 1168 (2612 catheters) to povidone iodine–alcohol (580 patients with scrubbing, 588 without). Chlorhexidine–alcohol was associated with lower incidence of catheter-related infections (0·28 vs 1·77 per 1000 catheter-days with povidone iodine–alcohol; hazard ratio 0·15, 95% CI 0·05–0·41; p=0·0002). Scrubbing was not associated with a significant difference in catheter colonisation (p=0·3877). No systemic adverse events were reported, but severe skin reactions occurred more frequently in those assigned to chlorhexidine–alcohol (27 [3%] patients vs seven [1%] with povidone iodine–alcohol; p=0·0017) and led to chlorhexidine discontinuation in two patients. Interpretation For skin antisepsis, chlorhexidine–alcohol provides greater protection against short-term catheter-related infections than does povidone iodine–alcohol and should be included in all bundles for prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Funding University Hospital of Poitiers, CareFusion.
Databáze: OpenAIRE