Thin-for-gestational age infants are at increased risk of neurodevelopmental delay at 2 years
| Autor: | Sinéad M. O'Neill, J. O'b. Hourihane, Ali S. Khashan, Deirdre M. Murray, Geraldine Hannon, Mairead Kiely, Louise C. Kenny |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male Pediatrics medicine.medical_specialty Developmental Disabilities Birth weight Gestational Age Child Behavior Disorders 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Risk Factors 030225 pediatrics Birth Weight Humans Medicine Prospective Studies Prospective cohort study 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine Anthropometry business.industry Infant Newborn Obstetrics and Gynecology Gestational age Cognition General Medicine Prognosis Increased risk Adipose Tissue Infant Small for Gestational Age Pediatrics Perinatology and Child Health Body Composition Neurodevelopmental delay Female business Birth cohort Neurocognitive Follow-Up Studies |
| Zdroj: | Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 102:F197-F202 |
| ISSN: | 1468-2052 1359-2998 |
| DOI: | 10.1136/archdischild-2016-310791 |
| Popis: | Infants born small-for-gestational age (SGA) are at increased risk of developmental difficulties. Identifying those most at risk is challenging. We examined the effect of neonatal body composition and customised birthweight centiles on neurocognitive and behavioural outcomes at age 2.Prospective cohort study of term infants from the Cork BASELINE Birth Cohort Study classified into the following exposure groups: a birth weight10th customised centile (SGA, n=51); body fat percentage at birth10th centile (thin-for-gestational age (TGA, n=51)) or both SGA and TGA infants (small- and thin-for-gestational age (STGA), n=13). The SGA, TGA and STGA groups were compared with a reference (unexposed) group of appropriate-for-gestational age (AGA, n=189) infants. Outcome was assessed at 24 months using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development Version III and the Child Behaviour Checklist.Outcomes in the SGA infants did not differ significantly from the AGA group. TGA infants had significantly lower scores across all three domains, with a 0.35, 0.38 and 0.41 SD reduction in language, cognitive and motor scale scores, respectively. STGA infants had poorer cognitive outcome with a median cognitive scale score of 90 (IQR 85-95) compared with 95 (IQR 90-100) in the AGA reference group, p=0.005. The adjusted OR of developmental delay at 2 years was 5.00 (95% CI 1.46 to 17.13, p=0.010) in the STGA group.TGA infants, in particular those born STGA, are at increased risk of developmental delay at 2 years compared with the AGA infants. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|