Comparison of GRACE and TIMI risk scores in the prediction of in-hospital and long-term outcomes among East Asian non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients
Autor: | Lu Yanqiao, Lan Shen, Miao Yutong, Shen Linghong, He Ben |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Male
China Time Factors Risk Assessment GRACE Risk Factors Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system Humans Thrombolytic Therapy cardiovascular diseases Registries Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction Aged Retrospective Studies TIMI Incidence Research Middle Aged Prognosis Survival Rate NSTEMI Outcome assessment RC666-701 Female Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine Follow-Up Studies |
Zdroj: | BMC Cardiovascular Disorders BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2022) |
ISSN: | 1471-2261 |
Popis: | Background Risk stratification in non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) determines the intervention time. Limited study compared two risk scores, the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk scores in the current East Asian NSTEMI patients. Methods This retrospective observational study consecutively collected patients in a large academic hospital between 01/01 and 11/01/2017 and followed for 4 years. Patients were scored by TIMI and GRACE scores on hospital admission. In-hospital endpoints were defined as the in-hospital composite event, including mortality, re-infarction, heart failure, stroke, cardiac shock, or resuscitation. Long-term outcomes were all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality in 4-year follow-up. Results A total of 232 patients were included (female 29.7%, median age 67 years), with a median follow-up of 3.7 years. GRACE score grouped most patients (45.7%) into high risk, while TIMI grouped the majority (61.2%) into medium risk. Further subgrouping the TIMI medium group showed that half (53.5%) of the TIMI medium risk population was GRACE high risk (≥ 140). Compared to TIMI medium group + GRACE p p p = 0.045) in 4-year follow-up. GRACE risk scores showed a better predictive ability than TIMI risk scores both for in-hospital and long-term outcomes. (AUC of GRACE vs. TIMI, In-hospital: 0.82 vs. 0.62; long-term mortality: 0.89 vs. 0.68; long-term cardiac mortality: 0.91 vs. 0.67, all p Conclusion GRACE showed better predictive accuracy than TIMI in East Asian NSTEMI patients in both in-hospital and long-term outcomes. The sequential use of TIMI and GRACE scores provide an easy and promising discriminative tool in predicting outcomes in NSTEMI East Asian patients. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |