Four dilation techniques in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a single-institute comparative analysis
| Autor: | Riccardo Giannella, Paolo Fedelini, Maurizio Fedelini, Francesco Chiancone, Clemente Meccariello |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Blood transfusion Urology medicine.medical_treatment 030232 urology & nephrology Nephrolithotomy Percutaneous Kidney Calculi 03 medical and health sciences Postoperative Complications 0302 clinical medicine medicine Humans Percutaneous nephrolithotomy Aged Retrospective Studies business.industry Perioperative Middle Aged medicine.disease Dilatation Surgery Logistic Models Treatment Outcome Nephrology 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Dilator Nephrostomy Balloon dilation Female Kidney stones business Complication |
| Zdroj: | Minerva Urology and Nephrology. 73 |
| ISSN: | 2724-6442 2724-6051 |
| DOI: | 10.23736/s2724-6051.20.03836-9 |
| Popis: | BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to compare four renal access techniques in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS A total of 437 patients who underwent PCNL at our center from January 2015 to December 2019 were included in the analysis. Telescopic metallic coaxial dilation (TMD) was used in 146 patients, single step balloon dilation (BD) in 98 patients, one-shot dilation with 30F Amplatz (OS 30F) in 106 patients, and one-shot dilation with 16F Amplatz (OS 16F) in 87 patients. Primary endpoints were perioperative outcomes and complications of the procedures. RESULTS Similar baseline characteristics were observed in the four groups. Fluoroscopy time was significantly shorter in OS 30F and OS 16F groups (P |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|