Unia kalmarska a unie polsko-litewskie – kilka uwag na temat ich początków i potrzeby kontynuacji badań porównawczych obu związków państwowych
| Autor: | Hubert Bąk, Andrzej Gaca |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Community and Home Care
Norvegija (Norway) Karalienės Unijos media_common.quotation_subject Member states Jadvyga (Lenkijos karalienė Jadwiga) Valdovai Krėvos sutartis 1385 (Krėvos aktas Krėvos unija Union of Krewo Act of Krėva) Vladislovas II Jogailaitis 1456-1516 (Władysław II Jagiellończyk Vladislav II Jagellonsk? Ul?szló II Ladislaus II) Lietuva (Lithuania) State (polity) Margarita (Danijos Norvegijos Švedijos karalienė Queen Margaret of Denmark Norway and Sweden) Comparative research Political science Economic history Lenkija (Lenkijos karalystė Rzeczpospolita Polska Kingdom of Poland Poland) Kalmaro unija Rivalry Švedija (Sweden) Eryk Pomorski media_common |
| Zdroj: | Rocznik Lituanistyczny 2020, 6, p. 135-166. |
| ISSN: | 2450-8454 2450-8446 |
| DOI: | 10.12775/rl.2020.6.07 |
| Popis: | The primary purpose of the authors is to draw attention to the need for continued comparative research into the Polish-Lithuanian unions and the Kalmar Union. The study presents mainly thoughts on the origins of the both unions and the early stages of the formation of those state entities. A comparative analysis has been carried out for, among others, the time of their creation together with their causes and circumstances put in the context of the stages of social, legal-political, and institutional development of the member states. The article also outlines the later history and transformations of these unions: both their factual and legal character, as well as the regulations of their functioning and consequences. These questions are presented mainly in a comparative way, with consideration for differences and similarities between the two unions. The authors bring out the problems of political, social, and economic nature, together with the dynastic policy of the united states; next, they describe similarities between the regulations of the unions regarding the order of succession to the throne. The subject of a synthetic comparison is also the later history of the two unions after they formally ended and their impact on the historical development of both Poland and Lithuania and the northern states. Still, one of the most important issues seems to be the answer to the question why both of the unions wasted their considerable political and military potential for joint action and new opportunities to achieve common political aims in northern and Eastern Europe? It would be worthwhile to compare their durability and influence on the future of their member states. One of the leading research postulates based on the attempts made so far is to compare subsequent stages, transformations and results, both direct and long-lasting, of the analysed unions of the states. The adoption of such a broad research perspective which is only outlined here, and then an attempt at a more comprehensive synthesis requires in the authors opinion collective efforts of many scholars, and especially international cooperation of historians specializing in Polish-Lithuanian and Swedish-Danish-Norwegian relations as well as the history of the Teutonic Order and the Hanseatic League. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|