Advanced life support provider course in Italy: A 5-year nationwide study to identify the determinants of course success
Autor: | Andrea Scapigliati, Erga L. Cerchiari, Giuseppe Ristagno, Gaetano Tammaro, Umberto Olcese, Federico Semeraro |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Cognitive and Systems Neuroscience (SILS, FNWI) |
Rok vydání: | 2015 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Resuscitation Educational measurement Time Factors Specialty Emergency Nursing Logistic regression Advanced Cardiac Life Support Physicians Surveys and Questionnaires medicine Humans Competence (human resources) Retrospective Studies business.industry Advanced cardiac life support Retrospective cohort study Middle Aged medicine.disease Advanced life support Italy Family medicine Emergency Medicine Education Medical Continuing Female Medical emergency Clinical Competence Educational Measurement Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Follow-Up Studies |
Zdroj: | Resuscitation, 96, 246-251. Elsevier |
ISSN: | 1873-1570 0300-9572 |
Popis: | INTRODUCTION: The advanced life support (ALS) provider course is the gold standard for teaching and assessing competence in advanced resuscitation. Outcomes over a 5-year period of European Resuscitation (ERC)/IRC ALS provider courses in Italy were investigated, and the factors associated with course success are described. METHODS: In 2008, the Italian Resuscitation Council (IRC) created a database in which every ERC/IRC ALS course was recorded. Data from courses organized from 2008 to 2012 were analysed. The data included: candidate's age and degree (medical doctor (MD) or nurse), medical specialty of MD candidates, course outcomes, duration and reference guidelines, number of instructors and course director. Relationships between the course outcomes and the courses and candidates' characteristics were analysed using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 13,624 candidates were evaluated from 871 courses. Among the candidates, 55% were MDs and 45% were nurses. Ninety-seven percent of candidates passed the final evaluation, while 3% failed. Candidates who passed were younger (37 [31-44] vs. 43 [37-50] years, p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |