Transmission of whole body vibration: comparison of three vibration platforms in healthy subjects
| Autor: | J. Mark Wilkinson, Lucy Spain, Lang Yang, Eugene V. McCloskey |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Adult Histology Physiology Thoracic spine Endocrinology Diabetes and Metabolism Acceleration Anterior superior iliac spine 030209 endocrinology & metabolism Vibration 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Bone Density medicine Whole body vibration Humans Z722 Femoral neck Physics Femur Neck Healthy subjects Z72 Healthy Volunteers 030104 developmental biology medicine.anatomical_structure Amplitude Lumbar spine Biomedical engineering |
| ISSN: | 8756-3282 |
| Popis: | The potential of whole body vibration (WBV) to maintain or enhance musculoskeletal strength during ageing is of increasing interest, with both low and high magnitude WBV having been shown to maintain or increase bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and femoral neck. The aim of this study was to determine how a range of side alternating and vertical WBV platforms deliver vibration stimuli up through the human body.\ud \ud Motion capture data were collected for 6 healthy adult participants whilst standing on the Galileo 900, Powerplate Pro 5 and Juvent 100 WBV platforms. The side alternating Galileo 900 WBV platform delivered WBV at 5-30 Hz and amplitudes of 0-5 mm. The Powerplate Pro 5 vertical WBV platform delivered WBV at 25 and 30 Hz and amplitude settings of 'Low' and 'High'.\ud \ud The Juvent 1000 vertical WBV platform delivered a stimulus at a frequency between 32 and 37 Hz and amplitude 10 fold lower than either the Galileo or Powerplate, resulting in accelerations of 0.3 g. Motion capture data were recorded using an 8 camera Vicon Nexus system with 21 reflective markers placed at anatomical landmarks between the toe and the forehead. Vibration was expressed as vertical RMS accelerations along the z-axis which were calculated as the square root of the mean of the squared acceleration values in g.\ud \ud The Juvent 1000 did not deliver detectable vertical RMS accelerations above the knees. In contrast, the Powerplate Pro 5 and Galileo 900 delivered vertical RMS accelerations sufficiently to reach the femoral neck and lumbar spine. The maximum vertical RMS accelerations at the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) were 1.00 g +/- 0.30 and 0.85 g +/- 0.49 for the Powerplate and Galileo respectively. For similar accelerations at the ASIS, the Galileo achieved greater accelerations within the lower limbs, whilst the Powerplate recorded higher accelerations in the thoracic spine at T10.\ud \ud The Powerplate Pro 5 and Galileo 900 deliver vertical RMS accelerations sufficiently to reach the femoral neck and lumbar spine, whereas the Juvent 1000 did not deliver detectable vertical RMS accelerations above the knee. The side alternating Galileo 900 showed greater attenuation of the input accelerations than the vertical vibrations of the Powerplate Pro 5. The platforms differ markedly in the transmission of vibration with strong influences of frequency and amplitude. Researchers need to take account of the differences in transmission between platforms when designing and comparing trials of whole body vibration. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect