Posture and Physical Activity Detection: Impact of Number of Sensors and Feature Type
| Autor: | Stephen S. Intille, Qu Tang, Binod Thapa-Chhetry, Diego J. Arguello, Dinesh John |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Computer science Posture Physical activity Physical Therapy Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Wrist Sitting Article Machine Learning 03 medical and health sciences Wearable Electronic Devices 0302 clinical medicine Physical medicine and rehabilitation Accelerometry medicine Feature (machine learning) Humans Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Exercise Orientation (computer vision) 030229 sport sciences Sedentary behavior medicine.anatomical_structure Female Ankle Sedentary Behavior F1 score |
| Zdroj: | Med Sci Sports Exerc |
| ISSN: | 1530-0315 |
| Popis: | Studies using wearable sensors to measure posture, physical activity (PA), and sedentary behavior typically use a single sensor worn on the ankle, thigh, wrist, or hip. Although the use of single sensors may be convenient, using multiple sensors is becoming more practical as sensors miniaturize. Purpose We evaluated the effect of single-site versus multisite motion sensing at seven body locations (both ankles, wrists, hips, and dominant thigh) on the detection of physical behavior recognition using a machine learning algorithm. We also explored the effect of using orientation versus orientation-invariant features on performance. Methods Performance (F1 score) of PA and posture recognition was evaluated using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation on a 42-participant data set containing 22 physical activities with three postures (lying, sitting, and upright). Results Posture and PA recognition models using two sensors had higher F1 scores (posture, 0.89 ± 0.06; PA, 0.53 ± 0.08) than did models using a single sensor (posture, 0.78 ± 0.11; PA, 0.43 ± 0.03). Models using two nonwrist sensors for posture recognition (F1 score, 0.93 ± 0.03) outperformed two-sensor models including one or two wrist sensors (F1 score, 0.85 ± 0.06). However, two-sensor models for PA recognition with at least one wrist sensor (F1 score, 0.60 ± 0.05) outperformed other two-sensor models (F1 score, 0.47 ± 0.02). Both posture and PA recognition F1 scores improved with more sensors (up to seven; 0.99 for posture and 0.70 for PA), but with diminishing performance returns. Models performed best when including orientation-based features. Conclusions Researchers measuring posture should consider multisite sensing using at least two nonwrist sensors, and researchers measuring PA should consider multisite sensing using at least one wrist sensor and one nonwrist sensor. Including orientation-based features improved both posture and PA recognition. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|