The Hip Fracture Patient on Warfarin: Evaluating Blood Loss and Time to Surgery

Autor: David S. Wellman, Dean G. Lorich, Matthew R. Cohn, Nikunj N. Trivedi, John P. Lyden, Joseph M. Lane, Jordan C. Villa, Ashley E. Levack
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Male
Blood transfusion
Arthroplasty
Replacement
Hip

medicine.medical_treatment
Blood Loss
Surgical

Tertiary Care Centers
Injury Severity Score
0302 clinical medicine
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
030212 general & internal medicine
030222 orthopedics
Hip fracture
Trauma center
Age Factors
General Medicine
Middle Aged
Fracture Fixation
Intramedullary

Treatment Outcome
Anesthesia
Female
medicine.drug
medicine.medical_specialty
Risk Assessment
Statistics
Nonparametric

Time-to-Treatment
03 medical and health sciences
Sex Factors
medicine
Humans
Blood Transfusion
International Normalized Ratio
Adverse effect
Aged
Retrospective Studies
Hip Fractures
business.industry
Warfarin
Anticoagulants
Retrospective cohort study
Emergency department
medicine.disease
Surgery
Logistic Models
Case-Control Studies
Multivariate Analysis
Hemiarthroplasty
business
Complication
Follow-Up Studies
Zdroj: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 31:407-413
ISSN: 0890-5339
Popis: OBJECTIVES To compare blood loss, delay of surgery, and short-term adverse events in (1) patients admitted on warfarin versus nonanticoagulated controls and (2) warfarin patients with day of surgery (DOS) international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.5 or greater versus below 1.5. DESIGN Retrospective cohort. SETTING Academic Level I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS One hundred twenty four patients treated surgically for hip fractures including patients presenting on warfarin (n = 62) and matched controls (n = 62). INTERVENTION Cephalomedullary nailing (CMN), hemiarthroplasty, or total hip arthroplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was transfusion rate. Secondary outcomes included calculated blood loss, 30-day complication rate, and hours from emergency department presentation to surgery. RESULTS There was no significant difference in blood transfusion rates between the warfarin and control groups (P = 0.86). Blood transfusion was required in 58.1% of patients in the warfarin group (48.3% of arthroplasties and 65.5% of CMNs) compared with 56.6% of controls (41.9% of arthroplasties and 73.3% of CMNs). There were also no significant differences in calculated blood loss or in complication rates. Patients on warfarin had significantly longer time to surgery (P < 0.01). Subanalysis of the warfarin group showed that patients with DOS INR at or above 1.5 had similar transfusion rates, blood loss, and complications compared with patients with INR below 1.5. Treatment with CMN was the only covariate that was found to be a significant independent predictor of transfusion on multivariable analysis (P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS Patients with hip fractures admitted on warfarin seem to be at similar risk of transfusion or adverse events compared with nonanticoagulated patients. Awaiting normalization of INR delayed surgery without reducing bleeding or preventing complications. Within reason, surgeons may consider proceeding with surgery in patients with INR above 1.5 if patients are otherwise medically optimized. The upper limit above which surgery causes increased blood loss is currently unknown. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Databáze: OpenAIRE