Follow-up effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for the major depressive episode: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor: | Andre R. Brunoni, Stefanie De Smet, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt, Pedro Sudbrack-Oliveira, Adriano H. Moffa, Lais B. Razza |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty medicine.medical_treatment MEDLINE Cochrane Library Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Bias Randomized controlled trial law medicine Humans Major depressive episode Biological Psychiatry Depressive Disorder Major Transcranial direct-current stimulation business.industry Publication bias 030227 psychiatry Psychiatry and Mental health Treatment Outcome Meta-analysis Physical therapy Observational study medicine.symptom business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Follow-Up Studies |
Zdroj: | Psychiatry Research. 302:114024 |
ISSN: | 0165-1781 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114024 |
Popis: | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is an effective treatment during the acute phase of a major depressive episode (MDE), although the evidence for its follow-up efficacy is mixed. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus (EMBASE), Web of Science, Cochrane Library and additional sources were searched from inception to April 29, 2021. Studies that followed up adults treated with tDCS during an MDE - using (interventional) and/or not using (observational) tDCS in the follow-up period were included. The primary outcome was the Hedges' g for the follow-up depression scores. Small study effects and sources of heterogeneity were explored. 427 studies were retrieved and 11 trials (13 datasets, n = 311) were included, most presenting moderate bias. Results showed a follow-up depression improvement (k = 13, g = -0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.28; -0.34, I² = 84.0%), which was probably driven by the interventional studies (k = 7, g= -1.12, 95% CI: -1.84; -0.40, I² = 87.1%). No predictor of response was associated with the outcome. No risk of publication bias was found. Significant between-study heterogeneity may have influenced the overall results. Our findings suggest that tDCS produces effects beyond the intervention period during MDEs. Maintenance sessions are advised in future research. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |