Exploring Perceptions and Practices About Information and Communication Technologies in Business English Teaching in Pakistan

Autor: M. Athar Hussain, N.B. Jumani, Munazza Sultana., M. Zafar Iqbal
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2010
Předmět:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1085012
Popis: Language Reforms and potential use of ICTs has been a focal area of Higher Education Commission of Pakistan. Efforts are being accelerated to incorporate fast expanding ICTs to bring qualitative improvement in language instruction in higher education. This paper explores how university teachers are benefitting from ICTs to make their English class effective and what type of problems they face in practicing ICTs during their lectures. An in-depth qualitative study was employed to understand why language teachers tend to use ICTs in their instruction and how they are practicing it. A sample of twenty teachers from five universities located in Islamabad, three from public sector and two from private sector, was selected on non-random (Snowball) sampling basis. An interview with 15 semi-structured items was used as research instruments to collect data. The findings reveal that business English teaching is facilitated and improved through the use of ICTs. The language teachers need special training regarding the practices and implementation of ICTs. It is recommended that initiatives might be taken to equip university language teachers with modern methodology incorporating ICTs as focal area and efforts might be made to remove barriers regarding the training of language teachers and proper usage of ICTs.
{"references":["Government of Pakistan (1998-2010). National Education Policy,\nIslamabad: Ministry of Education.","Warschauer, M. (2000). The changing global economy and the future of\nEnglish teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 511-533.","Okamoto, T. (2004). How a web based course facilitates acquisition of\nEnglish for academic purposes. Language Learning & Technology, 8(2),\n33-49. Retrieved from www.msu.edu.com.","Whitehead, D. & Whitehead, G. (1993). English for business. Oxford:\nM. Simple Books.","Fotos, S. & Browne, C. (2004). The development of CALL and current\noptions. In S. Fotos and C.M.Browne (Eds), New perspectives on CALL\nfor second language classrooms. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence\nErlbaum Associates, Publishers.","Susser, B. & Robb. T. N. (2004). Evaluation of ESL/EFL instructional\nwebsites.In S. Fotos & C. M. Browne (Eds.), NEW perspective on\nCALL for second language classroom. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence\nErlbaum Associates, Publishers.","Browne, C. & Gerrity, S. (2004). Setting up and maintaining a CALL\nlaboratory. New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms\n(pp. 171-198). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,\nPublishers.","Hassan, S. (2005). Reading and Writing skills for advanced students of\nbusiness English in Pakistan. NUML, Islamabad. Unpublished PhD\nThesis.","Finely, L & Hartman, D. (2004). Institutional change and resistance:\nTeacher preparatory faculty and technology integration. Journal of\nTechnology and Teacher Education, 12(3), 319-337.\n[10] Ertmer, P.A. (1999). Addressing first and second order barriers to\nchange: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology\nResearch & Development, 47(4), 47-61.\n[11] Chen, Yu-Li. (2008). Factors affecting the integration of information and\ncommunication technology in Language teaching. Asian EFL Journal.\nProfessional teaching articles.\n[12] Van Sachie, J. (1997). A World Wide Web survey on the use of\ninformation and communication technology in Education. European\nJournal of Teacher Education, 20:1, 85-92. Retrieved from\nwww.informaworld.com on 25 June, 2009.\n[13] Black, P. (1996). Changing the Subject: Innovations in science,\nmathematics and technology education. London: Routledge.\n[14] Higher Education Commission (2006) Annual Report 2005-06,\nIslamabad.\n[15] Maeers, M. & Cooper, D. (2002). A faculty of education as a community\nof learners: Growing to meet the demands of instruction and\ntechnology. Retrieved from www.eric.com.\n[16] Davies, G. (2003). Perspectives on offline and online training\ninitiatives.Language learning online: Towards best practice (pp. 193-\n214). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.\n[17] Chen, H.J. (2003). Internet-assisted language learning and professional\ndevelopment. Seminar on multimedia English teaching, Chungtai\ninstitute of health sciences and technology, pp. 16-33.\n[18] Safdar, M. (2008). Facilitating and empowering teachers through\ninformation and communication technologies. Conference Proceedings.\nIslamabad: SZBIST.\n[19] Epper, R.M. (2001). The new economy meets the Ivory tower. Teaching\nfaculty how to use technology: Best practices from leading institutions\n(pp. 1-18). Westport, CT: The American council on education, ORYX\npress.\n[20] Terwindt, S. (2000). Constructivist learning. Faculty development (pp.\n448-450). Retrieved from www.eric.com.\n[21] Brown, H.D. (2000). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to\nlanguage pedagogy. New York: Longman.\n[22] Solobodina, T. (2000). Faculty development in technology for teachers\nof English for specific purposes. Retrieved from www.eric.com on\nOctober, 2006.\n[23] Clark, K. (2000). Power Web searching techniques for teacher\neducators. ERIC document reproduction service no. ED 444497,\nretrieved from www.eric.com.\n[24] Shrivastava, P. (1998). Learning community. Retrieved from\nwww.Environmentalintel.com/Soc.\n[25] Merriam, S.B. (2002). Assessing and evaluating qualitative research:\nExamples for discussion and analysis. Qualitative Research in Practice\n(pp. 18-33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Company."]}
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: