Identifying research priorities in breast cancer surgery: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance

Autor: Shelley Potter, Katherine Fairhurst, Katherine Cowan, Simon Vincent, Ian Lewis, Ramsey I. Cutress, Hilary Stobart, Patricia Fairbrother, Sophia Turner, Kayleigh Davies-Crowley, Ranjeet Jeevan, Tim Rattay, Rachel O’Connell, Nigel Bundred, Stuart A. McIntosh
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: Potter, S, Fairhurst, K, Cowan, K, Vincent, S, Lewis, I, Cutress, R I, Stobart, H, Fairbrother, P, Turner, S, Davies-Crowley, K, Jeevan, R, Rattay, T, O'Connell, R, Bundred, N & McIntosh, S A 2023, ' Identifying research priorities in breast cancer surgery : a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance ', Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 197, no. 1, pp. 39-49 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06756-4
Potter, S, Fairhurst, K, Cowan, K, Vincent, S, Lewis, I, Cutress, R I, Stobart, H, Fairbrother, P, Turner, S, Davies-Crowley, K, Jeevan, R, Rattay, T, O’Connell, R, Bundred, N & McIntosh, S A 2023, ' Identifying research priorities in breast cancer surgery: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance ', Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 197, no. 1, pp. 39-49 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06756-4
ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06756-4
Popis: Purpose A James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership was developed to identify research priorities in breast cancer surgery from individuals with lived experience, at high genetic risk of breast cancer, and healthcare professionals (HCPs). Methods ‘Uncertainties’ were collected using an online survey. Following an evidence check and development of summary questions, an interim survey asked participants to rank their top 10 research priorities from the question list. Top-ranked questions from patient/carer, high-risk and professional groups were carried forward for discussion to a final online prioritisation workshop. Results 260 participants (101 patients/carers, 156 HCPs) submitted 940 uncertainties via the initial survey. These were analysed thematically into 128 summary questions in six topic areas. Following evidence checking, 59 questions were included in the interim survey which was completed by 572 respondents. Marked differences were seen in questions prioritised by patients/carers, HCPs and women at high-risk. The top eight priorities in patient/carer and professional groups and top two priorities for high-risk women were carried forward to the online workshop at which 22 participants discussed and agreed the final top 10. Key themes included de-escalation of breast and axillary surgery, factors impacting the development/detection of locoregional recurrence and optimal provision of support for informed treatment decision-making. Conclusion The top 10 research priorities in breast cancer surgery have been agreed. However, the observed differences in research priorities identified by patients and professional groups were not anticipated. Top priorities from both groups should inform future UK breast cancer surgical research, to ensure that it addresses questions that are important to breast cancer community as a whole.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: