Global Risk Classification and Clinical SYNTAX (Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery) Score in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous or Surgical Left Main Revascularization

Autor: Gianpaolo Ussia, Glauco Cincotta, Alessio La Manna, Maria Elena Di Salvo, Piera Capranzano, Anna Caggegi, Giuseppe Giacchi, Fabio Dipasqua, Davide Capodanno, Marco Miano, Corrado Tamburino
Jazyk: angličtina
Předmět:
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.medical_treatment
Coronary Artery Disease
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
risk score
Revascularization
Coronary Angiography
Risk Assessment
Severity of Illness Index
Decision Support Techniques
Predictive Value of Tests
Risk Factors
Internal medicine
medicine
Health Status Indicators
Humans
Registries
cardiovascular diseases
Angioplasty
Balloon
Coronary

Coronary Artery Bypass
Aged
Retrospective Studies
Aged
80 and over

Framingham Risk Score
Ejection fraction
business.industry
Patient Selection
Hazard ratio
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Reproducibility of Results
EuroSCORE
Drug-Eluting Stents
Middle Aged
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
surgical procedures
operative

Italy
Predictive value of tests
Conventional PCI
Cardiology
coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)
Female
revascularization
percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
business
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
Zdroj: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. (3):287-297
ISSN: 1936-8798
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.10.013
Popis: Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the ability to predict cardiac mortality of the Global Risk Classification (GRC) and the Clinical SYNTAX (Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery) score (CSS) in left main (LM) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Background There is a renewed interest in combining clinical and angiographic information to define the risk of patients undergoing LM revascularization. Methods The GRC and CSS were assessed in patients undergoing LM PCI (n = 400) or CABG (n = 549). Stand-alone clinical (ACEF [age, creatinine, ejection fraction]), EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) and angiographic (SYNTAX score) risk scores were also investigated. Results The GRC (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic 0.357, p = 0.550; area under the curve 0.743) and the ACEF (Hosmer-Lemeshow 0.426, p = 0.514; area under the curve 0.741) showed the most balanced predictive characteristics in the PCI and CABG cohorts, respectively. In PCI patients, the CSS used fewer data to achieve similar discrimination but poorer calibration than the GRC. Propensity-adjusted outcomes were comparable between PCI and CABG patients with low, intermediate, or high EuroSCORE, ACEF, GRC, and CSS and those with low or intermediate SYNTAX score. Conversely, in the group with the highest SYNTAX score, the risk of cardiac mortality was significantly higher in PCI patients (hazard ratio: 2.323, 95% confidence interval: 1.091 to 4.945, p = 0.029). Conclusions In LM patients undergoing PCI, combined scores improve the discrimination accuracy of clinical or angiographic stand-alone tools. In LM patients undergoing CABG, the ACEF score has the best prognostic accuracy compared with other stand-alone or combined scores. The good predictive ability for PCI along with the poor predictive ability for CABG make the SYNTAX score the preferable decision-making tool in LM disease.
Databáze: OpenAIRE