Comparison of articaine and lidocaine for infiltration anaesthesia in patients undergoing bone marrow aspiration and biopsy
| Autor: | Anna-Maria Kuivalainen, Per H. Rosenberg, Erkki Elonen, Leila Niemi-Murola, Tom Widenius |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2009 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Lidocaine Adolescent Pain Carticaine Anxiety Articaine Sternal Manubrium Iliac crest law.invention 03 medical and health sciences Young Adult 0302 clinical medicine Randomized controlled trial Double-Blind Method law Bone Marrow Biopsy Medicine Humans Young adult Anesthetics Local Aged Pain Measurement Aged 80 and over medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Biopsy Needle Middle Aged 3. Good health Surgery Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine medicine.anatomical_structure Anesthesia Female Bone marrow business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery 030215 immunology medicine.drug Anesthesia Local |
| Zdroj: | European journal of pain (London, England). 14(2) |
| ISSN: | 1532-2149 |
| Popis: | Infiltration anaesthesia with articaine, a local anaesthetic able to penetrate bone, may relieve procedural pain better than lidocaine in bone marrow aspiration and biopsy. This randomised, double-blind study comprised 150 patients with suspected or known haematologic disease. Either articaine 20mg/ml (50 patients), articaine 40mg/ml (49 patients) or lidocaine 20mg/ml (51 patients), all with adrenaline 5mug/ml, was infiltrated in volume of 6ml (sternal manubrium), 8ml (sternal body) or 10ml (iliac crest) 2min before puncture. Numeral rating scale score (median, range) at injection of local anaesthetic was 3.0 (0-10), at bone puncture 2.0 (0-8), at aspiration 3.5 (0-10) and at biopsy (48 patients) 3.0 (0-10). Pre-procedural anxiety, rated on a verbal scale, correlated significantly with experienced pain (P |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text