The 'two-week wait' referral pathway is not associated with improved survival for patients with colorectal cancer
| Autor: | Baljit Singh, John Stuart Jameson, S. Chaudhri, Muhammad Imran Aslam |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male Pediatrics medicine.medical_specialty Time Factors Referral Colorectal cancer Improved survival Kaplan-Meier Estimate Statistics Nonparametric Screening programme 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine medicine Humans In patient Prospective Studies 030212 general & internal medicine Referral and Consultation Survival analysis Aged Neoplasm Staging business.industry Cancer General Medicine Middle Aged medicine.disease University hospital 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Female Surgery Colorectal Neoplasms business |
| Zdroj: | International Journal of Surgery. 43:181-185 |
| ISSN: | 1743-9191 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.05.046 |
| Popis: | To improve survival rates in patients diagnosed with cancer in the UK, a two-week wait (2ww) referral to first appointment target and a 62 day referral to treatment target were introduced in 2004. This study analyses survival rates for patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) by mode of referral and referral to treatment time.A prospectively maintained database of CRC outcomes at the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust was analysed. Data for patients diagnosed with CRC was analysed for survival. Comparisons were made by mode of referral (2ww, urgent, routine, emergency, national bowel cancer screening programme (NBCSP) and other screening pathways). In addition, this study assessed referral to initial treatment times for patients undergoing cancer resection (62days group vs.62days group). Inter-group comparisons were made using the Mann-Whitney-U-test. Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimates were calculated for overall survival and the log-rank test was used to compare the survival distributions in different groups.Overall survival (median time) was significantly lower for patients referred by the '2ww' pathway (3.5 years, 95% CI: 2.7-4.30), in comparison to the 'routine' (5.4 years, 95% CI: 4.5-6.6) pathway (p 0.001). Patients referred on the '2ww' pathway were 1.34 times more likely to have stage IV disease at presentation in comparison to patients referred by the 'routine' pathway. Comparison of referral to initial treatment times showed there was no significant difference in survival between the62days group and the62days group (7.1 vs. 6.54, p = 0.620).Patients diagnosed with CRC by the 2ww pathway had shorter survival times than those referred by a routine pathway. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect