Short-term Results of the RAPID Randomized Trial of the Legflow Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon With Supera Stenting vs Supera Stenting Alone for the Treatment of Intermediate and Long Superficial Femoral Artery Lesions

Autor: Lee H Bouwman, Daniel A. F. van den Heuvel, Pieter G A Hooijboer, Rutger J Hissink, Jan Albert Vos, Ted W F Vink, Dittmar Böckler, Damnis Vroegindeweij, Jean-Paul P.M. de Vries, Debbie A B de Vries-Werson, Otto E. H. Elgersma, Bram Fioole, Floris W F Vos, Rudolph P Tutein Nolthenius, Dmitriy I. Dovzhanskiy, Jan M.M. Heyligers, Sanne W de Boer, Bernart de Leeuw, Gerlof P T Bosma
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Time Factors
Drug coated balloon
Paclitaxel
Self Expandable Metallic Stents
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
Balloon
law.invention
Peripheral Arterial Disease
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Coated Materials
Biocompatible

Randomized controlled trial
law
Germany
Multicenter trial
Alloys
medicine
Humans
Radiology
Nuclear Medicine and imaging

In patient
Prospective Studies
cardiovascular diseases
030212 general & internal medicine
Vascular Patency
Aged
Netherlands
Ultrasonography
Doppler
Duplex

Superficial femoral artery
business.industry
Angiography
Cardiovascular Agents
Equipment Design
Middle Aged
equipment and supplies
Surgery
Femoral Artery
Treatment Outcome
surgical procedures
operative

Self-expanding stent
Female
Paclitaxel eluting balloon
Radiology
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
business
Angioplasty
Balloon

Vascular Access Devices
Zdroj: Journal of Endovascular Therapy. 24:783-792
ISSN: 1545-1550
1526-6028
DOI: 10.1177/1526602817725062
Popis: To report a randomized trial comparing the Legflow paclitaxel-eluting balloon (PEB) + Supera stenting to Supera stenting alone in patients with intermediate to long superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions.The multicenter RAPID trial ( controlled-trials.com ; identifier ISRCTN47846578) randomized (1:1) 160 patients (mean age 67 years; 102 men) with Rutherford category 2-6 ischemia to treatment with Legflow PEB + Supera stent or Supera stent alone in intermediate to long SFA lesions (mean lesion length 15.8±7.4 vs 15.8±7.6 cm, respectively). The efficacy outcome was primary patency, defined as freedom from restenosis on duplex ultrasound or angiography.Baseline characteristics including the percentage of occlusions were similar between groups. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the estimated primary patency at 1 year was 68.3% (95% CI 56.7% to 79.9%) in the PEB + Supera group vs 62.0% (95% CI 49.1% to 74.9%) in the Supera group (p=0.900). Per-protocol analysis showed a 12-month primary patency estimate of 74.7% (95% CI 63.1% to 86.3%) in the PEB + Supera group vs 62.0% (95% CI 49.1% to 74.9%) in the control group (p=0.273). Secondary patency estimates at 12 months (per-protocol analysis) were 89.0% (95% CI 80.6% to 97.4%) vs 98.0% (95% CI 94.1% to 100%; p=0.484); the estimates for freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) were 83.0% (95% CI 72.8% to 93.2%) and 77.8% (95% CI 66.6% to 89.0%; p=0.277), respectively.The short-term results from the multicenter RAPID randomized controlled trial indicate that the Legflow PEB is safe and feasible for the treatment of intermediate to long SFA lesions. In this trial, at least 70% of the patients suffered an occlusion. The PEB group had higher rates of primary patency and freedom from CD-TLR, although there were no statistically significant differences vs controls.
Databáze: OpenAIRE