Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin
| Autor: | Saadet Saglam Atsu, H. Cenker Kucukesmen, Mehmet A. Kilicarslan, P. Sema Aka |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2006 |
| Předmět: |
Ceramics
Time Factors Materials science Surface Properties Scanning electron microscope Dental bonding Composite Resins Dental Materials stomatognathic system Materials Testing Aluminum Oxide Humans Ceramic Composite material Universal testing machine Bond strength Dental Bonding Temperature Water Luting agent Silanes Silicon Dioxide Resin Cements Air Abrasion Dental stomatognathic diseases visual_art Silanization Microscopy Electron Scanning visual_art.visual_art_medium Methacrylates Stress Mechanical Zirconium Adhesive Oral Surgery Shear Strength |
| Zdroj: | The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 95:430-436 |
| ISSN: | 0022-3913 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.016 |
| Popis: | Kilicarslan, Mehmet Ali/0000-0002-8619-957X WOS: 000238395200007 PubMed: 16765155 Statement of problem. Surface treatment methods used for resin bonding to conventional silica-based dental ceramics are not reliable for zirconium-oxide ceramics. Purpose. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of airborne-particle abrasion, silanization, tribochemical silica coating, and a combination of bonding/silane coupling agent surface treatment methods on the bond strength of zirconium-oxide ceramic to a resin luting agent. Material and methods. Sixty square-shaped (5 X 5 X 1.5 mm) zirconium-oxide ceramic (Cercon) specimens and composite resin (Z-250) cylinders (3 X 3 mm) were prepared. The ceramic surfaces were airborne-particle abraded with 125-mu m aluminum-oxide (Al2O3) particles and then divided into 6 groups (n=10) that were subsequently treated as follows: Group C, no treatment (control); Group SIL, silanized with a silane coupling agent (Clearfil Porcelain Bond Activator); Group BSIL, application of the adhesive 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate monomer (MDP)-containing bonding/silane coupling agent mixture (Clearfil Liner Bond 2V/Porcelain Bond Activator); Group SC, silica coating using 30-mu m Al2O3 particles modified by silica (CoJet System); Group SCSIL, silica coating and silanization (CoJet System); and Group SCBSIL, silica coating and application of an MDP-containing bonding/silane coupling agent mixture (Clearfil Liner Bond 2V/Porcclain Bond Activator). The composite resin cylinders were bonded to the treated ceramic surfaces using an adhesive phosphate monomer-containing resin luting agent (Panavia F). After the specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours, their shear bonding strength was tested using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Debonded specimen surfaces were examined with a stereomicroscope to assess the mode of failure, and the treated surfaces were observed by scanning electron microscopy. Bond strength data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance and the Duncan test (alpha=.05). Results. The bond strengths (mean +/- SD; MPa) in the groups were as follows: Group C, 15.7 +/- 2.9; Group SIL, 16.5 +/- 3.4; Group BSIL, 18.8 +/- 2.8; Group SC, 21.6 +/- 3.6; Group SCSIL, 21.9 +/- 3.9; and Group SCBSIL, 22.9 +/- 3.1. The bond strength was significantly higher in Group SCBSIL than in Groups C, SIL, and BSIL (P |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect