Effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on the progression of diabetic nephropathy
Autor: | Gengru Jiang, Jian-Ping Shan, Yan-Ni Sun, Li-Jing Sun |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Meta‐ analysis Hyperkalemia Endocrinology Diabetes and Metabolism Urinary system 030232 urology & nephrology Urology Renal function Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors Diabetic nephropathy 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology urologic and male genital diseases law.invention Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Randomized controlled trial law Diabetes mellitus Internal Medicine medicine Humans Diabetic Nephropathies cardiovascular diseases Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist business.industry Standard treatment Articles General Medicine medicine.disease female genital diseases and pregnancy complications Clinical Science and Care Relative risk Original Article Drug Therapy Combination medicine.symptom business |
Zdroj: | Journal of Diabetes Investigation |
ISSN: | 2040-1116 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jdi.12629 |
Popis: | Aims/Introduction We aimed to evaluate the potential benefits and adverse effects of adding a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) to angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and/or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), as standard treatment in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Materials and Methods We scanned the Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for human clinical trials published in English until June 2016, evaluating renal outcomes in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Results A total of 18 randomized controlled trials involving 1,786 patients were included. Compared with ACEI/ARB alone, co‐administration of MRA and ACEI/ARB significantly reduced urinary albumin excretion and the urinary albumin–creatinine ratio (mean difference −69.38, 95% confidence intervals −103.53 to −35.22, P < 0.0001; mean difference −215.74, 95% confidence intervals −409.22 to −22.26, P = 0.03, respectively). A decrease of blood pressure was also found in the co‐administration of MRA and ACEI/ARB groups. However, we did not observe any improvement in the glomerular filtration rate. There was a significant increase in the risk of hyperkalemia on the addition of MRA to ACEI/ARB treatment (relative risk 3.74, 95% confidence intervals 2.30–6.09, P < 0.00001). Conclusions These findings suggest that co‐administration of MRA and ACEI/ARB has beneficial effects on renal outcomes with increasing the incidence of hyperkalemia. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |