Long-Term Assessment of Lurasidone in Schizophrenia: Post Hoc Analysis of a 12-Month, Double Blind, Active-Controlled Trial and 6-Month Open-Label Extension Study
Autor: | Jens Nilsson, Preeya J Patel, Andrew P Jones, Christian Weidenfeller, Jay Hsu |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Cardiometabolic
medicine.medical_specialty medicine.drug_class Atypical antipsychotic law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Randomized controlled trial law Internal medicine Post-hoc analysis medicine 030212 general & internal medicine Adverse effect RC346-429 Lurasidone Original Research Risperidone Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale business.industry Switch medicine.disease Metabolic syndrome Prolactin Neurology Schizophrenia Neurology (clinical) Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | Neurology and Therapy, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 121-147 (2020) Neurology and Therapy |
ISSN: | 2193-6536 2193-8253 |
Popis: | Introduction A post hoc analysis of a double-blind (DB) active control trial and an open-label extension (OLE) study was conducted to evaluate the long-term effects of lurasidone in patients with schizophrenia. Methods In the DB trial, patients were randomised to receive lurasidone or risperidone for 12 months. In OLE, all patients received lurasidone for an additional 6 months. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated. Efficacy assessments included relapse rate (DB trial only), and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Clinical Global Impression–Severity scale, and Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale. Results In the DB trial, patients with schizophrenia were randomised to lurasidone (n = 399) and risperidone (n = 190), of whom 129 and 84 continued into OLE, respectively. During the DB trial, incidence of TEAEs was similar for lurasidone (84.1%) and risperidone (84.2%). Lurasidone was associated with minimal changes in metabolic variables and prolactin levels, whereas risperidone was associated with clinically significant increases in prolactin and fasting glucose levels. The proportion of patients with metabolic syndrome was significantly lower in patients treated with lurasidone versus risperidone at the end of the DB trial (25.5% vs 40.4%; p = 0.0177). During OLE, patients switching from risperidone to lurasidone experienced a reduction in weight and prolactin levels; those continuing treatment with lurasidone experienced minimal changes in metabolic variables and prolactin. At the end of OLE, the proportion of patients with metabolic syndrome was no longer significantly different between groups (23.5% vs 31.5%; p = not significant). Efficacy outcomes were generally similar between groups during the DB trial, and were maintained during OLE. Conclusion Lurasidone was generally well tolerated and effective in clinically stable schizophrenia patients over the long term. Lurasidone was also generally well tolerated and maintained effectiveness over 6 months in patients switching from risperidone. Patients switching from risperidone experienced improvements in metabolic parameters and prolactin levels. These findings confirm lurasidone’s long-term effectiveness and favourable metabolic profile in patients with schizophrenia. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00641745. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |