Deontic Variation in the ‘Advice’ for the Cure of the Plague by the Royal College of Physicians of London (1665 vs 1636 editions)
| Autor: | Biscetti, Stefania |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2022 |
| Předmět: |
Cultural Studies
Linguistics and Language History Literature and Literary Theory Sociology and Political Science Visual Arts and Performing Arts Historical Pragmatics Religious studies Deontic ‘Might’ English Modal Auxiliaries Diachronic Variation Language and Linguistics Normative Instructional Discourse Deontic ‘Might’ Diachronic Variation English Modal Auxiliaries Historical Pragmatics Normative Instructional Discourse |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Early Modern Studies. |
| ISSN: | 2279-7149 |
| DOI: | 10.36253/jems-2279-7149-14107 |
| Popis: | The ‘Advice’ drawn up by the College of Physicians for the prevention and cure of the plague was first published in 1578. It was attached to the Orders, a list of directions drawn up by the Privy Council to prevent or limit the spread of the disease. Like the Orders to which it was appended, the ‘Advice’ went through several reprints until 1630, when it had to be rewritten. The 1630 edition of the ‘Advice’ no longer confined itself to medical prescriptions, but included advice about medical provision in the city, the movement of goods and people, and referred to the political measures taken in foreign cities. In this revised, extended version, the ‘Advice’ was reprinted in 1636 and in 1665, when it finally appeared without the preceding Orders. This paper focuses on the pragma-linguistic changes displayed by the 1665 edition as compared with the 1636 edition of the ‘Advice’ in terms of mood and modality (Palmer 1986) and argues that the more mitigated expression of deontic modality and the preference for assertive acts over directive ones (Searle 1985) characterizing the later edition reflect the new editorial and historical context in which the text was produced. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|