123I-MIBG scintigraphy and 18F-FDG-PET imaging for diagnosing neuroblastoma

Autor: Judit A. Adam, Huib N Caron, Godelieve A.M. Tytgat, Elvira C. van Dalen, Lotty Hooft, Gitta Bleeker, Leontien C. M. Kremer
Rok vydání: 2015
Předmět:
INRG TASK-FORCE
medicine.medical_specialty
Adolescent
Review
Single-photon emission computed tomography
Research Support
Scintigraphy
Sensitivity and Specificity
Diagnostic Test Accuracy Review
Neuroblastoma
POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY
HIGH-RISK NEUROBLASTOMA
MIBG-SCINTIGRAPHY
Journal Article
Forest plot
medicine
Humans
Pharmacology (medical)
Stage (cooking)
Non-U.S. Gov't
Child
NEURAL CREST TUMORS
Tomography
Emission-Computed
Single-Photon
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Research Support
Non-U.S. Gov't
Infant
Newborn
Infant
medicine.disease
Confidence interval
3-Iodobenzylguanidine
WHOLE-BODY SCAN
Positron emission tomography
Child
Preschool
Positron-Emission Tomography
Meta-analysis
I-123 METAIODOBENZYLGUANIDINE SCINTIGRAPHY
STAGE-IV NEUROBLASTOMA
BONE-MARROW INVOLVEMENT
Radiology
FOLLOW-UP
Nuclear medicine
business
Meta-Analysis
Zdroj: The Cochrane Library
The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 9, 1. John Wiley and Sons Ltd
ISSN: 1465-1858
1469-493X
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009263.pub2
Popis: Background Neuroblastoma is an embryonic tumour of childhood that originates in the neural crest. It is the second most common extracranial malignant solid tumour of childhood. Neuroblastoma cells have the unique capacity to accumulate Iodine-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG), which can be used for imaging the tumour. Moreover, 123I-MIBG scintigraphy is not only important for the diagnosis of neuroblastoma, but also for staging and localization of skeletal lesions. If these are present, MIBG follow-up scans are used to assess the patient's response to therapy. However, the sensitivity and specificity of 123I-MIBG scintigraphy to detect neuroblastoma varies according to the literature. Prognosis, treatment and response to therapy of patients with neuroblastoma are currently based on extension scoring of 123I-MIBG scans. Due to its clinical use and importance, it is necessary to determine the exact diagnostic accuracy of 123I-MIBG scintigraphy. In case the tumour is not MIBG avid, fluorine-18-fluorodeoxy-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is often used and the diagnostic accuracy of this test should also be assessed. Objectives Primary objectives: 1.1 To determine the diagnostic accuracy of 123I-MIBG (single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), with or without computed tomography (CT)) scintigraphy for detecting a neuroblastoma and its metastases at first diagnosis or at recurrence in children from 0 to 18 years old. 1.2 To determine the diagnostic accuracy of negative 123I-MIBG scintigraphy in combination with 18F-FDG-PET(-CT) imaging for detecting a neuroblastoma and its metastases at first diagnosis or at recurrence in children from 0 to 18 years old, i.e. an add-on test. Secondary objectives: 2.1 To determine the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET(-CT) imaging for detecting a neuroblastoma and its metastases at first diagnosis or at recurrence in children from 0 to 18 years old. 2.2 To compare the diagnostic accuracy of 123I-MIBG (SPECT-CT) and 18F-FDG-PET(-CT) imaging for detecting a neuroblastoma and its metastases at first diagnosis or at recurrence in children from 0 to 18 years old. This was performed within and between included studies. 123I-MIBG (SPECT-CT) scintigraphy was the comparator test in this case. Search methods We searched the databases of MEDLINE/PubMed (1945 to 11 September 2012) and EMBASE/Ovid (1980 to 11 September 2012) for potentially relevant articles. Also we checked the reference lists of relevant articles and review articles, scanned conference proceedings and searched for unpublished studies by contacting researchers involved in this area. Selection criteria We included studies of a cross-sectional design or cases series of proven neuroblastoma, either retrospective or prospective, if they compared the results of 123I-MIBG (SPECT-CT) scintigraphy or 18F-FDG-PET(-CT) imaging, or both, with the reference standards or with each other. Studies had to be primary diagnostic and report on children aged between 0 to 18 years old with a neuroblastoma of any stage at first diagnosis or at recurrence. Data collection and analysis One review author performed the initial screening of identified references. Two review authors independently performed the study selection, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality. We used data from two-by-two tables, describing at least the number of patients with a true positive test and the number of patients with a false negative test, to calculate the sensitivity, and if possible, the specificity for each included study. If possible, we generated forest plots showing estimates of sensitivity and specificity together with 95% confidence intervals. Main results Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Ten studies reported data on patient level: the scan was positive or negative. One study reported on all single lesions (lesion level). The sensitivity of 123I-MIBG (SPECT-CT) scintigraphy (objective 1.1), determined in 608 of 621 eligible patients included in the 11 studies, varied from 67% to 100%. One study, that reported on a lesion level, provided data to calculate the specificity: 68% in 115 lesions in 22 patients. The sensitivity of 123I-MIBG scintigraphy for detecting metastases separately from the primary tumour in patients with all neuroblastoma stages ranged from 79% to 100% in three studies and the specificity ranged from 33% to 89% for two of these studies. One study reported on the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET(-CT) imaging (add-on test) in patients with negative 123I-MIBG scintigraphy (objective 1.2). Two of the 24 eligible patients with proven neuroblastoma had a negative 123I-MIBG scan and a positive 18F-FDG-PET(-CT) scan. The sensitivity of 18F-FDG-PET(-CT) imaging as a single diagnostic test (objective 2.1) and compared to 123I-MIBG (SPECT-CT) (objective 2.2) was only reported in one study. The sensitivity of 18F-FDG-PET(-CT) imaging was 100% versus 92% of 123I-MIBG (SPECT-CT) scintigraphy. We could not calculate the specificity for both modalities. Authors' conclusions The reported sensitivities of 123-I MIBG scintigraphy for the detection of neuroblastoma and its metastases ranged from 67 to 100% in patients with histologically proven neuroblastoma. Only one study in this review reported on false positive findings. It is important to keep in mind that false positive findings can occur. For example, physiological uptake should be ruled out, by using SPECT-CT scans, although more research is needed before definitive conclusions can be made. As described both in the literature and in this review, in about 10% of the patients with histologically proven neuroblastoma the tumour does not accumulate 123I-MIBG (false negative results). For these patients, it is advisable to perform an additional test for staging and assess response to therapy. Additional tests might for example be 18F-FDG-PET(-CT), but to be certain of its clinical value, more evidence is needed. The diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET(-CT) imaging in case of a negative 123I-MIBG scintigraphy could not be calculated, because only very limited data were available. Also the detection of the diagnostic accuracy of index test 18F-FDG-PET(-CT) imaging for detecting a neuroblastoma tumour and its metastases, and to compare this to comparator test 123I-MIBG (SPECT-CT) scintigraphy, could not be calculated because of the limited available data at time of this search. At the start of this project, we did not expect to find only very limited data on specificity. We now consider it would have been more appropriate to use the term "the sensitivity to assess the presence of neuroblastoma" instead of "diagnostic accuracy" for the objectives. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY 123I-MIBG- and 18F-FDG-PET-imaging, two nuclear imaging methods for diagnosing neuroblastoma tumours Background and rationale Neuroblastoma is a childhood tumour that can be visualized by a specific nuclear imaging compound, called metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I -MIBG). 123I-MIBG-imaging is not only important for the diagnosis of neuroblastoma, but also for localization of metastases (spread of the disease to other organs). Sometimes, the neuroblastoma does not take up 123I-MIBG and as a result the neuroblastoma is not visible on the scan. In that case, another type of nuclear imaging might be useful to visualize the neuroblastoma: fluoro-deoxy-glucose – positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET)-imaging. In the literature the ability to discriminate between neuroblastoma and non-neuroblastoma lesions for these two types of nuclear imaging methods vary. Prognosis, treatment and response to therapy of patients with neuroblastoma are currently based on scoring the amount of metastases per body segment visible on 123I-MIBG scans. Therefore, it is important to determine the exact ability to discriminate between neuroblastoma and non-neuroblastoma on 123I-MIBG-imaging and 18F-FDG-PET-imaging. We reviewed the evidence about the accuracy of 123I-MIBG-imaging and 18F-FDG-PET-imaging for the detection of a neuroblastoma in children suspected of this disease. Study characteristics We searched scientific databases for clinical studies comparing 123I-MIBG or 18F-FDG-PET imaging, or both, with microscopic examination of tissue suspected of neuroblastoma (histopathology). The evidence is current up to 11 September 2012. We identified 11 eligible studies including 621 children that fulfilled our inclusion criteria: children < 18 years old with a neuroblastoma and 123I-MIBG or 18F-FDG-PET imaging or both. All studies included proven neuroblastoma. Quality of the evidence All 11 included studies had methodological limitations. Only one included study provided data on specificity (the ability of a test to correctly classify an individual as 'disease-free') and therefore we could not perform all of the planned analyses. Key results When compared to histopathological results the sensitivity (the ability of a test to correctly classify an individual person as 'diseased') of 123I-MIBG imaging varied from 67% to 100% in patients with histologically proven neuroblastoma. This means that in 100 children with proven neuroblastoma 123I-MIBG imaging will correctly identify 67 to 100 of the neuroblastoma cases. Only one study, that reported on a lesion level, provided data to calculate the specificity (the ability of a test to correctly classify an individual as 'disease-free'): 68% in 115 lesions. This means that of 100 disease-free lesions in patients with proven neuroblastoma 123I-MIBG imaging will correctly identify 68 lesions. So, in about 10% of the cases the neuroblastoma is not visible on 123I-MIBG imaging (false negative results). For these cases, it is advisable to perform an additional test like 18F-FDG-PET imaging, but to be certain of its clinical value, more evidence is needed. Only one included study reported on false positive findings. This means that 123I-MIBG imaging and 18F-FDG-PET imaging incorrectly identified neuroblastoma lesions in patients which might result in wrongly classifying a patient with metastatic disease. It is important to keep in mind that false positive findings can occur, although more research is needed before definitive conclusions can be made. We could not determine the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET imaging, in case the neuroblastoma was incorrectly not identified with 123I-MIBG, due to limited data. Also, we could not calculate the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET imaging for detecting a neuroblastoma and compare this to 123I-MIBG imaging because of the limited available data.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: