Three Dimensional Glomerular Reconstruction: A Novel Approach to Evaluate Renal Microanatomy in Diabetic Kidney Disease
Autor: | Alison Skene, George Jerums, Sianna Panagiotopoulos, Richard J MacIsaac, Paul Crammer, Niloufar Torkamani, Michele V Clarke, Elif I Ekinci, David A. Power |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Male
0301 basic medicine Correlation coefficient Kidney Glomerulus Renal function lcsh:Medicine Type 2 diabetes Article Transforming Growth Factor beta1 Mice 03 medical and health sciences Imaging Three-Dimensional 0302 clinical medicine Microscopy Electron Transmission Diabetes mellitus Image Processing Computer-Assisted medicine Albuminuria Animals Humans Diabetic Nephropathies lcsh:Science Aged Multidisciplinary Diabetic kidney business.industry lcsh:R Glomerular mesangium Heart Fibroblasts Middle Aged medicine.disease Glomerular Mesangium Mice Inbred C57BL 030104 developmental biology Hyperglycemia Female lcsh:Q Analysis of variance medicine.symptom business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Glomerular Filtration Rate Biomedical engineering |
Zdroj: | Scientific Reports, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2019) Scientific Reports |
ISSN: | 2045-2322 |
Popis: | Mesangial metrics reflect glomerular filtration surface area in diabetes. The point-sampled intercept (PSI) method is the conventional method to calculate these parameters. However, this is time consuming and subject to underestimation. We introduce a novel three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction method applicable to light microscopy to measure mesangial metrics. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), PSI and our new 3D imaging methods were used to quantify mesangial metrics from 22 patients with type 2 diabetes, normo-, micro- and macroalbuminuria and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 2. Repeated-measures ANOVA test was used to test the equality of the measurement means from the three methods and the degree of inter method variability. Repeated-measures and post-estimation ANOVA tests together with correlation coefficient measurements were used to compare the methods with TEM as reference. There was a statistically significant difference in mesangial volume measurements (F(2, 16) = 15.53, p = 0.0002). The PSI method underestimated measurements compared to TEM and 3D methods by 30% (p = 0.001) and 15%, respectively (p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |