Evaluation of research in context: an approach and two cases
Autor: | Peter van den Besselaar, Barend van der Meulen, Stefan P. L. de Jong, Floortje Daemen, Pleun van Arensbergen |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Organization Sciences, Network Institute, Organization & Processes of Organizing in Society (OPOS), Rathenau Institute |
Rok vydání: | 2011 |
Předmět: |
Research evaluation
SDG 16 - Peace Research groups Management science Research areas media_common.quotation_subject SDG 16 - Peace Justice and Strong Institutions Context (language use) Library and Information Sciences Justice and Strong Institutions Education Quality (business) Sociology Architecture media_common |
Zdroj: | Research Evaluation, 20(1), 61-72. Beech Tree Publishing de Jong, S, van Arensbergen, P, Daemen, F, van der Meulen, B & van den Besselaar, P A A 2011, ' Evaluating of research in context-an approach and two cases ', Research Evaluation, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 61-72 . https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X12941371876346 |
ISSN: | 1471-5449 0958-2029 |
DOI: | 10.3152/095820211x12941371876346 |
Popis: | Science is increasingly heterogeneous, posing new questions for research evaluation. How can we evaluate the between scientific and societal quality of research, taking into account differences between research fields and between research groups? In this paper we present the findings of two case studies in fields where societal and scholarly output of research are highly intertwined (architecture and law). We analyze the nature of the two fields in terms of research areas and specific aspects of knowledge dynamics. This results in an approach and indicators for contextual research evaluation. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |