Unsedated Small-caliber Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)
| Autor: | John M. Inadomi, Jeffrey L. Barnett, Adam B. Gorelick |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2001 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Time Factors Endoscope Sedation Survey result Time-Consuming Humans Hypnotics and Sedatives Medicine Small caliber Endoscopy Digestive System Endoscopes medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Gastroenterology Middle Aged Endoscopy Surgery Tolerability Case-Control Studies Costs and Cost Analysis Feasibility Studies Female medicine.symptom business |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 33:210-214 |
| ISSN: | 0192-0790 |
| DOI: | 10.1097/00004836-200109000-00008 |
| Popis: | Background: A significant portion of the costs and complications of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) are related to the use of sedation. The feasibility and tolerability of small-caliber EGD (scEGD) without sedation has been evaluated; however, there is limited data concerning times and costs associated with this procedure as compared with conventional EGD (cEGD) with sedation. Study: Sixteen patients underwent scEGD with the Pentax EG-1840 (outside diameter, 6 mm) without sedation. A control group of 16 patients was matched for age, sex, day, and indication of procedure. The time of procedure, time in procedure room, time in recovery room, and procedure costs were determined in both the study and control groups. After the procedure, scEGD patients completed surveys consisting of visual-analogue scales to assess tolerance and preference regarding sedation for future procedures. Results: Procedure time, procedure room time, and recovery room time was 5.2, 16.3, and 9 minutes for scEGD and 13.5, 34.9, and 41.3 minutes for cEGD, respectively (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The mean cost of scEGD, excluding physician fees, was $462.00, which was significantly lower than the $587.00 for cEGD (p < 0.001). Survey results revealed good tolerance for the unsedated procedure. Conclusions: Unsedated scEGD was well tolerated and resulted in a shorter time of procedure, less time spent in procedure room, reduced recovery room time, and lower costs as compared with cEGD with sedation. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|