Correction: Antegrade versus retrograde facial nerve dissection in benign parotid surgery: Is there a difference in postoperative outcomes? A meta-analysis

Autor: Faez Saleh Al-Hamed, Mubarak Ahmed Mashrah, Taghrid Ahmed Al-dhohrah, Lingjian Yan, Fahmi Ahmed Al-zubeiry, Chaobin Pan, Xiaopeng Zhao
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Cancer Treatment
lcsh:Medicine
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Nervous System
law.invention
Mathematical and Statistical Techniques
0302 clinical medicine
Randomized controlled trial
law
Medicine and Health Sciences
Paralysis
Parotid Gland
Postoperative Period
030223 otorhinolaryngology
lcsh:Science
Multidisciplinary
Nerves
Dissection
Statistics
Cranial Nerves
Metaanalysis
Middle Aged
Facial nerve
Paresis
Facial Nerve
Surgical Oncology
Treatment Outcome
Oncology
Meta-analysis
Physical Sciences
Medicine
Anatomy
medicine.symptom
Research Article
Clinical Oncology
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Drug Research and Development
Science
Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures
Sialocele
Research and Analysis Methods
03 medical and health sciences
Young Adult
Signs and Symptoms
Diagnostic Medicine
medicine
Humans
Clinical Trials
Statistical Methods
Benign Tumors
Fistulas
Aged
Pharmacology
business.industry
lcsh:R
Biology and Life Sciences
Cancers and Neoplasms
Correction
Retrospective cohort study
030206 dentistry
Parotidectomy
medicine.disease
Otolaryngological Procedures
Randomized Controlled Trials
Surgery
Relative risk
Linear Models
lcsh:Q
Clinical Medicine
business
Publication Bias
Mathematics
Zdroj: PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE, Vol 13, Iss 10, p e0206028 (2018)
PLoS ONE, Vol 15, Iss 11, p e0242299 (2020)
ISSN: 1932-6203
Popis: Objective The primary aim of this meta-analysis was to test the null hypothesis of no difference in facial nerve dysfunction in studies that compared classical antegrade facial nerve dissection (AFND) versus retrograde facial nerve dissection (RFND) during benign parotid surgery. Methods A comprehensive search of PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Google Scholar, Science Direct and relevant journals was undertaken up to June 27, 2018. Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), and retrospective studies aimed at comparing the effect of AFND vs. RFND during parotidectomy were included. The outcome measures included facial nerve dysfunction, Frey’s syndrome, recurrence, silaocele, salivary fistula, operating time length of hospital stay, and estimated blood loss. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using either a fixed-effects or random-effects model. Results Ten studies; four RCTs and five retrospective studies were included. There were 570 patients (319 in RFND group and 251 in AFND group). 481 patients in 9 studies reported the incidence rate of facial nerve dysfunction. No statistical significant difference was observed between both groups concerning the occurrence of transient or permanent facial nerve paralysis (p = 0.44 and 0.11 respectively). One out 10 studies reported the incidence rate of sialocele, however no statistical difference was observed between the two techniques. There was reduction in the operative time (19.30 min), amount of blood loss (25.08 ml) and amount of healthy salivary tissues removed (12.20 mm) in RFND compared with AFND. Conclusions According to the results of the current review there is no evidence demonstrating a significant advantage of one approach over another, therefore, well-designed standardized RCTs are required.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: