Competing for policy: Lobbying in the EU wholesale roaming regulation
Autor: | Amanda M. Alves, Nada Mimouni, Timothy Yu-Cheong Yeung, Eric Brousseau |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Université Paris Dauphine-PSL, Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL), Dauphine Recherches en Management (DRM), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centre d'études et de recherche en informatique et communications (CEDRIC), Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Informatique pour l'Industrie et l'Entreprise (ENSIIE)-Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM] (CNAM), Catholic University of Leuven - Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven), HESAM Université (HESAM)-HESAM Université (HESAM) |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Topic model
Economics and Econometrics Commission Library and Information Sciences Management Monitoring Policy and Law Public administration Management Information Systems Politics Mixed approach Political science 0502 economics and business media_common.cataloged_instance 050207 economics European union ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS media_common [QFIN]Quantitative Finance [q-fin] Communication 05 social sciences Public consultation [SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance [SHS.SCIPO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Political science Work (electrical) Roaming 050203 business & management Information Systems |
Zdroj: | Telecommunications Policy Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, 2021, 45 (3), pp.102087. ⟨10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102087⟩ |
ISSN: | 0308-5961 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102087⟩ |
Popis: | This work examines the informational lobbying prior to the proposal drafting by the European Commission on the wholesale roaming regulation through the lens of the framework of political market. We employ a mixed approach that combines topic modelling, multivariate regression, and qualitative text analysis based on the textual replies to the public consultation launched by the Commission prior to the first draft of the regulation proposal. Our analysis identifies two main topics of debate and discovers diverse opinions within each topic. Regression analysis that explains alignments of preferences between the Commission and the stakeholders does not point to any evidence that the Commission consistently took the same positions as stakeholders of certain characteristics. Instead, this work argues that lobbying pressure was not effective in such a heterogeneous industry and the Commission was able to navigate easily the diverse interests and to pursue its own policy ambition. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |