Ecological and cultural factors underlying the global distribution of prejudice
Autor: | Ashley Fulmer, Jovana Balanovic, Klaus Boehnke, Márta Fülöp, Carol R. Ember, Loes M. Kreemers, Gerben A. van Kleef, Jamin Halberstadt, Marieke Christina van Egmond, Vidar Schei, Michele J. Gelfand, Ronald Fischer, Virginia K. Choi, Inger Nordli Basker, Colleen Ward, Astrid C. Homan, Joshua Conrad Jackson, Noémi Büki, Erna Szabo |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Ha, Shang E., Arbeids- en Organisatie Psychologie (Psychologie, FMG), Sociale Psychologie (Psychologie, FMG) |
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Radicalization
Internationality Statistical methods media_common.quotation_subject Science Political Science Culture Ecological and Environmental Phenomena Social Sciences 050109 social psychology Conservatism Cultural conflict Elections Racism 050105 experimental psychology Cultural Anthropology Governments Sociology Cross-Cultural Studies Cross-cultural Humans 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences 10. No inequality media_common Multidisciplinary Ecology 05 social sciences Politics Racial Discrimination Statistics Social Discrimination Nationalism Cultural heritage Research and analysis methods Monte Carlo method Physical sciences Religion Anthropology Medicine Mathematical and statistical techniques Prejudice Mathematics Research Article Political Parties |
Zdroj: | PLoS ONE PLoS ONE, Vol 14, Iss 9, p e0221953 (2019) PLOS ONE PLoS ONE, 14(9):e0221953. Public Library of Science |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
Popis: | Prejudiced attitudes and political nationalism vary widely around the world, but there has been little research on what predicts this variation. Here we examine the ecological and cultural factors underlying the worldwide distribution of prejudice. We suggest that cultures grow more prejudiced when they tighten cultural norms in response to destabilizing ecological threats. A set of seven archival analyses, surveys, and experiments (∑N = 3,986,402) find that nations, American states, and pre-industrial societies with tighter cultural norms show the most prejudice based on skin color, religion, nationality, and sexuality, and that tightness predicts why prejudice is often highest in areas of the world with histories of ecological threat. People's support for cultural tightness also mediates the link between perceived ecological threat and intentions to vote for nationalist politicians. Results replicate when controlling for economic development, inequality, conservatism, residential mobility, and shared cultural heritage. These findings offer a cultural evolutionary perspective on prejudice, with implications for immigration, intercultural conflict, and radicalization. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |