Objective Assessment of Eye Dominance Using the VEP
Autor: | Kevin T. Willeford, Kenneth J. Ciuffreda, G. A. Zikos |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2016 |
Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty genetic structures Visual Acuity Pilot Projects Sensory system Audiology Stimulus (physiology) Ocular dominance Correlation 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Vision Monocular medicine Humans Evoked potential Dioptre Aged Analysis of Variance Vision Binocular Monocular business.industry Middle Aged eye diseases Dominance Ocular Ophthalmology 030221 ophthalmology & optometry Evoked Potentials Visual Female sense organs Analysis of variance business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
Zdroj: | Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice. 42:129-134 |
ISSN: | 1542-2321 |
DOI: | 10.1097/icl.0000000000000149 |
Popis: | OBJECTIVES To develop a clinical protocol for the determination of eye dominance using an objective method (i.e., the visual evoked potential [VEP]), and furthermore to determine the correlation of these objective findings with clinical subjective tests of eye dominance to provide guidance in clinical monovision refractive correction. METHODS The Diopsys NOVA-TR system was used to record the VEP amplitude and latency of 10 visually-normal, presbyopic, adult subjects aged 50 to 70 years ((Equation is included in full-text article.)=60, SEM=0.17 years). First, eye dominance was assessed in two ways: a sensory-based "sensitivity to blur task" and a motor-based "sighting task." Next, while monocularly defocused, subjects binocularly viewed a black-and-white checkerboard (20-min arc size), pattern-reversal stimulus under 7 different test conditions: (1) baseline, (2) dominant (DE) eye blurred +1 diopter (D), (3) nondominant (NDE) eye blurred +1 D, (4) DE +2 D, (5) NDE +2 D, (6) DE +3 D, and (7) NDE +3 D. RESULTS Under nearly all conditions (22/24=92%), the amplitude and latency were significantly different from baseline with any amount of defocus (P |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |