Difference in dose-volumetric data between the analytical anisotropic algorithm, the dose-to-medium, and the dose-to-water reporting modes of the Acuros XB for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy
Autor: | Kenji Kitsuda, Wambaka Ange Mampuya, Mitsuhiro Nakamura, Yoshinori Hirose, Takashi Ishigaki, Masahiro Hiraoka, Takashi Mizowaki |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2016 |
Předmět: |
Lung Neoplasms
Acuros XB Stereotactic body radiation therapy medicine.medical_treatment dose‐to‐medium (Dm) stereotactic body radiation therapy Radiosurgery AAA (anisotropic analytical algorithm) 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine medicine Radiation Oncology Physics Humans Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Radiation treatment planning Instrumentation Mathematics Radiation Phantoms Imaging business.industry Radiotherapy Planning Computer-Assisted Volumetric data Water Isocenter Radiotherapy Dosage Acuros xb 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Analytical anisotropic algorithm Anisotropy Radiotherapy Intensity-Modulated Nuclear medicine business Stereotactic body radiotherapy Algorithms dose‐to‐water (Dw) dose‐volumetric data |
Zdroj: | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics |
ISSN: | 1526-9914 |
DOI: | 10.1120/jacmp.v17i5.6338 |
Popis: | The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference in dose‐volumetric data between the analytical anisotropic algorithms (AAA) and the two dose reporting modes of the Acuros XB, namely, the dose to water (AXB−Dw) and dose to medium (AXB−Dm) in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Thirty‐eight plans were generated using the AXB−Dm in Eclipse Treatment Planning System (TPS) and then recalculated with the AXB−Dw and AAA, using identical beam setup. A dose of 50 Gy in 4 fractions was prescribed to the isocenter and the planning target volume (PTV) D95%. The isocenter was always inside the PTV. The following dose‐volumetric parameters were evaluated; D2%, D50%, D95%, and D98% for the internal target volume (ITV) and the PTV. Two‐tailed paired Student's t‐tests determined the statistical significance. Although for most of the parameters evaluated, the mean differences observed between the AAA, AXB−Dmand AXB−Dw were statistically significant (p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |