The efficacy of misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol in the induction of labor of nulliparous women: A randomized national multicenter trial

Autor:	Maija-Riitta Ordén, Heidi Kruit, Emma Hokkila, Susanna Timonen, Liisa Laatio, Mirjami Mattila, Jukka Uotila, Kati Tihtonen, Leena Rahkonen, Tiina Luukkaala
Rok vydání:	2019
Předmět:	Adult medicine.medical_specialty Time Factors Amniotic fluid nulliparity medicine.medical_treatment Bishop score Administration Oral Uterine hyperstimulation 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Pregnancy Oxytocics Multicenter trial Humans Medicine Labor Induced Prospective Studies 030212 general & internal medicine Cervix Misoprostol misoprostol 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine Cesarean Section business.industry Vaginal delivery Obstetrics Obstetrics and Gynecology General Medicine 3. Good health Administration Intravaginal Parity cesarian section medicine.anatomical_structure Labor induction Female labor induction misoprostol vaginal insert prostaglandin vaginal delivery business medicine.drug
Zdroj:	Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 98:1032-1039
ISSN:	1600-0412 0001-6349
DOI:	10.1111/aogs.13580
Popis:	Introduction: Our objective was to compare the efficacy of a 200‐μg misoprostol vaginal insert vs oral misoprostol regarding the cesarean section rate and the time interval to vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix. Material and methods: In this prospective multicenter trial, 283 nulliparous women at term with Bishop score
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_dedup___::904835072a97261c2dcb4d6d615c8f1f https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13580 Zobrazit plný text záznamu