Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of drug‐resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and individual participant data meta‐analysis of real‐world evidence
| Autor: | Anthony C. Wang, George M. Ibrahim, Alexander G. Weil, Bahar Salavati, Diana Babayan, Naif M. Alotaibi, Aria Fallah, Sean T Pianka, Yonatan A. Cooper |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Outcome predictors medicine.medical_treatment Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation 050105 experimental psychology law.invention 03 medical and health sciences Epilepsy 0302 clinical medicine Randomized controlled trial law Internal medicine medicine 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Psychiatry Univariate analysis business.industry Full‐Length Original Research 05 social sciences Publication bias Drug Resistant Epilepsy medicine.disease Confidence interval Transcranial magnetic stimulation Treatment Neurology Meta-analysis Meta‐analysis Neurology (clinical) business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
| Zdroj: | Epilepsia Open |
| ISSN: | 2470-9239 |
| Popis: | Summary Objective To perform a systematic review and meta‐analysis of real‐world evidence for the use of low‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of drug‐resistant epilepsy. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Medline, and clinicaltrials.gov for all relevant articles. Relevant patient and stimulation predictors as well as seizure outcomes were assessed. For studies with and without individual participant data (IPD), the primary outcomes were the rate of “favorable response” (reduction in seizure frequency ≥50%) and pooled event rate of mean reduction in seizure frequency, respectively. Outcomes were assessed with comparative statistics and random‐effects meta‐analysis models. Results Of 3,477 identified articles, 12 met eligibility and were included in this review. We were able to obtain IPD for 5 articles constituting 34 participants. Univariate analysis on IPD identified greater favorable response event rates between participants with temporal seizure focus versus extratemporal (50% vs. 14%, p = 0.045) and between participants who were stimulated with a figure‐8 coil versus other types (47% vs. 0%, p = 0.01). We also performed study‐level meta‐analysis on the remaining 7 studies without IPD, which included 212 participants. The pooled mean event rate of 50% seizure reduction using low‐frequency rTMS was 30% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12–57%). Sensitivity analysis revealed that studies with a mean age ≤21 years and studies using targeted stimulation had the highest seizure reduction rates compared to studies with a mean age >21 years (69% vs. 18%) and not using a targeted stimulation (47% vs. 14–20%). Moreover, we identified high interstudy heterogeneity, moderate study bias, and high publication bias. Significance Real‐world evidence suggests that low‐frequency rTMS using a figure‐8 coil may be an effective therapy for the treatment of drug‐resistant epilepsy in pediatric patients. This meta‐analysis can inform the design and expedite recruitment of a subsequent randomized clinical trial. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text